Alternatives to cURL logo

Alternatives to cURL

Postman, HTTPie, FileZilla, Flurl, and WinSCP are the most popular alternatives and competitors to cURL.
224
205
+ 1
0

What is cURL and what are its top alternatives?

Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.
cURL is a tool in the File Transfer category of a tech stack.
cURL is an open source tool with 25.9K GitHub stars and 5.2K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to cURL's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to cURL

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • HTTPie
    HTTPie

    It is a Modern command line HTTP client – user-friendly curl alternative with intuitive UI, JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, etc ...

  • FileZilla
    FileZilla

    It is a powerful and free software for transferring files over the Internet. It is a very popular FTP client and is used by webmasters from all over the world. ...

  • Flurl
    Flurl

    It is a modern, fluent, asynchronous, testable, portable, buzzword-laden URL builder and HTTP client library for .NET. ...

  • WinSCP
    WinSCP

    It is a popular SFTP client and FTP client for Microsoft Windows. Copy file between a local computer and remote servers using FTP, FTPS, SCP, SFTP, WebDAV or S3 file transfer protocols. ...

  • Cyberduck
    Cyberduck

    It is a libre server and cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows with support for FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox. ...

  • AWS Transfer for SFTP
    AWS Transfer for SFTP

    AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol. AWS helps you seamlessly migrate your file transfer workflows to AWS Transfer for SFTP—by integrating with existing authentication systems, and providing DNS routing with Amazon Route 53—so nothing changes for your customers and partners, or their applications. ...

  • WeTransfer
    WeTransfer

    It is file sharing at its simplest. It works as if your e-mail account can support those large file sizes, you type in your e-mail address and the recipient’s e-mail address, add a message, attach the file, and send. ...

cURL alternatives & related posts

Postman logo

Postman

75.9K
63.4K
1.8K
Only complete API development environment
75.9K
63.4K
+ 1
1.8K
PROS OF POSTMAN
  • 487
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 274
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 155
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 143
    The best api workflow out there
  • 53
    It's the best
  • 53
    History feature
  • 44
    Adds real value to my workflow
  • 42
    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
  • 34
    The best in class app
  • 11
    Can save and share script
  • 9
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 7
    Collections
  • 7
    Option to run scrips
  • 7
    Global/Environment Variables
  • 6
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 6
    Shareable Collections
  • 6
    Dark theme easy on the eyes
  • 5
    Awesome customer support
  • 5
    Great integration with newman
  • 4
    Simple
  • 4
    The test script is useful
  • 4
    Documentation
  • 3
    Easy as pie
  • 3
    Saves responses
  • 3
    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
  • 3
    This has simplified my testing significantly
  • 2
    API-network
  • 2
    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
  • 2
    Mocking API calls with predefined response
  • 1
    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
  • 1
    Graph
  • 1
    Postman Runner CI Integration
  • 1
    Now supports GraphQL
  • 1
    Continuous integration using newman
  • 1
    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
  • 0
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
  • 0
    Runner
CONS OF POSTMAN
  • 9
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 7
    Bloated features and UI
  • 7
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 3
    Expensive
  • 2
    Not free after 5 users
  • 2
    Can't prompt for per-request variables
  • 1
    Support websocket
  • 1
    Import curl
  • 1
    Import swagger

related Postman posts

Noah Zoschke
Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.3M views

We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 26 upvotes · 2.9M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
HTTPie logo

HTTPie

41
45
0
A command-line HTTP client made for APIs
41
45
+ 1
0
PROS OF HTTPIE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF HTTPIE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related HTTPie posts

      FileZilla logo

      FileZilla

      155
      84
      0
      The free FTP solution for both client and server
      155
      84
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF FILEZILLA
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF FILEZILLA
          Be the first to leave a con

          related FileZilla posts

          Flurl logo

          Flurl

          105
          3
          0
          Fluent URL builder and testable HTTP client for .NET
          105
          3
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF FLURL
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF FLURL
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Flurl posts

              WinSCP logo

              WinSCP

              58
              27
              0
              A popular SFTP client and FTP client for Microsoft Windows
              58
              27
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF WINSCP
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF WINSCP
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related WinSCP posts

                  Cyberduck logo

                  Cyberduck

                  27
                  34
                  0
                  An open-source client for FTP and SFTP, WebDAV, and cloud storage
                  27
                  34
                  + 1
                  0
                  PROS OF CYBERDUCK
                    Be the first to leave a pro
                    CONS OF CYBERDUCK
                      Be the first to leave a con

                      related Cyberduck posts

                      AWS Transfer for SFTP logo

                      AWS Transfer for SFTP

                      17
                      12
                      0
                      Fully Managed SFTP Service for Amazon S3
                      17
                      12
                      + 1
                      0
                      PROS OF AWS TRANSFER FOR SFTP
                        Be the first to leave a pro
                        CONS OF AWS TRANSFER FOR SFTP
                          Be the first to leave a con

                          related AWS Transfer for SFTP posts

                          WeTransfer logo

                          WeTransfer

                          10
                          13
                          1
                          A cloud-based computer file transfer service
                          10
                          13
                          + 1
                          1
                          PROS OF WETRANSFER
                          • 1
                            Easy to use
                          CONS OF WETRANSFER
                            Be the first to leave a con

                            related WeTransfer posts