StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Postman vs cURL

Postman vs cURL

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Postman
Postman
Stacks96.1K
Followers82.5K
Votes1.8K
Forks0
cURL
cURL
Stacks525
Followers254
Votes1
GitHub Stars39.8K
Forks6.9K

cURL vs Postman: What are the differences?

cURL is a command-line tool used for transferring data using various protocols. On the other hand, Postman is a user-friendly tool to test and interact with APIs. Let's explore the key differences between Postman and cURL:

  1. User Interface and Interaction: Postman offers a user-friendly graphical interface to easily build, send, and manage API requests. It provides a visual representation of the requests and responses, making it easy to inspect and analyze the data. On the other hand, cURL is a command-line tool that operates through a terminal or command prompt. It requires users to construct and execute requests using command-line parameters and syntax, which may have a steeper learning curve for beginners. cURL's command-line interface offers flexibility and power, but it lacks visual feedback and convenience.

  2. Request Configuration and Flexibility: Postman provides a comprehensive set of tools for configuring API requests. It allows users to easily set headers, query parameters, request bodies, and authentication credentials through its intuitive interface. Postman also supports dynamic variables and environment settings. cURL, on the other hand, requires users to construct requests manually using command-line options and flags. While cURL provides extensive control and flexibility over the request configuration, it may be less user-friendly for complex request setups and may require more manual effort.

  3. Additional Features and Integration: Postman includes features like automated testing, scripting, mocking, and documentation generation. Postman also has a rich ecosystem with integrations for source control, CI/CD pipelines, and other tools commonly used in API development. cURL, on the other hand, focuses solely on making HTTP requests and lacks the built-in features and integrations provided by Postman. However, cURL can be easily integrated into various scripting and automation workflows, making it a preferred choice for command-line and scripting-based scenarios.

  4. Learning Curve and Accessibility: Postman is designed to be accessible to both beginners and experienced developers. Its intuitive user interface makes it easy to get started and work with APIs. Postman also provides extensive documentation and resources to help users understand and utilize its features effectively. cURL, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with command-line interfaces or the intricacies of constructing HTTP requests using command-line options.

In summary, Postman provides a user-friendly, graphical interface with a wide range of features and integrations, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced developers. cURL, on the other hand, is a command-line tool that provides flexibility and control over request construction but requires more manual effort and may be more suitable for users comfortable with command-line interfaces.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Postman, cURL

Jagdeep
Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

ReviewonPostmanPostman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k
Comments
Stephen
Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Postman
Postman
cURL
cURL

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.

Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
39.8K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
6.9K
Stacks
96.1K
Stacks
525
Followers
82.5K
Followers
254
Votes
1.8K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
Cons
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
Pros
  • 1
    Quickly view HTTP headers
Integrations
HipChat
HipChat
Keen
Keen
Slack
Slack
Dropbox
Dropbox
Datadog
Datadog
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Bigpanda
Bigpanda
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Newman
Newman
VictorOps
VictorOps
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Postman, cURL?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase