Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
cURL vs Postman: What are the differences?
cURL is a command-line tool used for transferring data using various protocols. On the other hand, Postman is a user-friendly tool to test and interact with APIs. Let's explore the key differences between Postman and cURL:
User Interface and Interaction: Postman offers a user-friendly graphical interface to easily build, send, and manage API requests. It provides a visual representation of the requests and responses, making it easy to inspect and analyze the data. On the other hand, cURL is a command-line tool that operates through a terminal or command prompt. It requires users to construct and execute requests using command-line parameters and syntax, which may have a steeper learning curve for beginners. cURL's command-line interface offers flexibility and power, but it lacks visual feedback and convenience.
Request Configuration and Flexibility: Postman provides a comprehensive set of tools for configuring API requests. It allows users to easily set headers, query parameters, request bodies, and authentication credentials through its intuitive interface. Postman also supports dynamic variables and environment settings. cURL, on the other hand, requires users to construct requests manually using command-line options and flags. While cURL provides extensive control and flexibility over the request configuration, it may be less user-friendly for complex request setups and may require more manual effort.
Additional Features and Integration: Postman includes features like automated testing, scripting, mocking, and documentation generation. Postman also has a rich ecosystem with integrations for source control, CI/CD pipelines, and other tools commonly used in API development. cURL, on the other hand, focuses solely on making HTTP requests and lacks the built-in features and integrations provided by Postman. However, cURL can be easily integrated into various scripting and automation workflows, making it a preferred choice for command-line and scripting-based scenarios.
Learning Curve and Accessibility: Postman is designed to be accessible to both beginners and experienced developers. Its intuitive user interface makes it easy to get started and work with APIs. Postman also provides extensive documentation and resources to help users understand and utilize its features effectively. cURL, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve, especially for users who are not familiar with command-line interfaces or the intricacies of constructing HTTP requests using command-line options.
In summary, Postman provides a user-friendly, graphical interface with a wide range of features and integrations, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced developers. cURL, on the other hand, is a command-line tool that provides flexibility and control over request construction but requires more manual effort and may be more suitable for users comfortable with command-line interfaces.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of cURL
- Quickly view HTTP headers1
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of cURL
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1