StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Cycle.io vs minikube

Cycle.io vs minikube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

minikube
minikube
Stacks110
Followers262
Votes3
GitHub Stars31.1K
Forks5.1K
Cycle.io
Cycle.io
Stacks7
Followers12
Votes0

minikube vs Cycle.io: What are the differences?

Developers describe minikube as "Local Kubernetes engine". It implements a local Kubernetes cluster on macOS, Linux, and Windows. Its goal is to be the tool for local Kubernetes application development and to support all Kubernetes features that fit. On the other hand, Cycle.io is detailed as "A full-featured container orchestration and infrastructure management platform focused on simplicity". Cycle is a full-featured container orchestration and infrastructure management platform focused on simplicity. With a SaaS-managed operating system built specifically for containers, Cycle becomes the bridge between you and your infrastructure. Simplify the stack and gain the benefits of your own private cloud that spans multiple providers. Cycle functions as a drop-in DevOps team, empowering your developers to focus less on deployment, and more and development.

minikube and Cycle.io belong to "Container Tools" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by minikube are:

  • Local Kubernetes
  • LoadBalancer
  • Multi-cluster

On the other hand, Cycle.io provides the following key features:

  • Simple, powerful container orchestration
  • UI-focused
  • Multi-cloud

minikube is an open source tool with 17.2K GitHub stars and 2.72K GitHub forks. Here's a link to minikube's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

minikube
minikube
Cycle.io
Cycle.io

It implements a local Kubernetes cluster on macOS, Linux, and Windows. Its goal is to be the tool for local Kubernetes application development and to support all Kubernetes features that fit.

Cycle is the most developer-friendly container orchestration platform. By simplifying the processes around container and infrastructure deployments, Cycle enables developers to spend more time building and less time managing.

Local Kubernetes; LoadBalancer; Multi-cluster
Simple, powerful container orchestration;UI-focused;Multi-cloud; Fully managed infrastructure;Built from the ground up;not based on Docker or Kubernetes;Fully integrated DevOps pipelines;Container native;Integrated DNS management;one-click deployment;built-in VPN service;automatic networking between providers/datacenters;supports AWS, Packet, Vultr, and more
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
110
Stacks
7
Followers
262
Followers
12
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Let's me test k8s config locally
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Can use same yaml config I'll use for prod deployment
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to minikube, Cycle.io?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana