StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. DeepSource Analyzer vs SonarLint

DeepSource Analyzer vs SonarLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16
DeepSource
DeepSource
Stacks16
Followers49
Votes8

DeepSource Analyzer vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Key Differences between DeepSource Analyzer and SonarLint

Introduction:

DeepSource Analyzer and SonarLint are both code review tools that help developers analyze and improve the quality of their code. However, there are several key differences between the two tools that sets them apart from each other.

  1. Type of Analysis: DeepSource Analyzer specializes in static code analysis, whereas SonarLint supports both static and dynamic code analysis. Static code analysis involves scanning the source code without executing it, while dynamic code analysis involves executing the code to identify any issues during runtime.

  2. Supported Languages: DeepSource Analyzer supports a limited set of programming languages, such as Python, JavaScript, and Go. On the other hand, SonarLint supports a wide range of languages including Java, C#, JavaScript, Python, Kotlin, and more. This difference in language support makes SonarLint a more versatile choice for development teams working with diverse technology stacks.

  3. Integration: DeepSource Analyzer can be seamlessly integrated into the code hosting platforms like GitHub and GitLab, allowing for continuous analysis and review of code changes. SonarLint, however, integrates with various Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) such as Eclipse, Visual Studio, IntelliJ IDEA, and others, providing developers with real-time feedback during code development.

  4. Rule Set: DeepSource Analyzer offers a predefined set of rules that are specific to each programming language it supports. These rules cover various code quality issues and best practices. In contrast, SonarLint provides a much larger set of rules that are categorized into different categories like code smells, potential bugs, security vulnerabilities, and more. This extensive rule set in SonarLint enables developers to enforce a broader range of coding standards.

  5. Scalability: DeepSource Analyzer is primarily designed for small to medium-sized projects and does not scale well for large-scale applications. On the other hand, SonarLint is built to handle large codebases efficiently and can support enterprise-level projects with thousands of lines of code.

  6. Accessibility: DeepSource Analyzer offers a cloud-based solution where the analysis is performed on their servers, requiring an active internet connection. SonarLint, on the other hand, can be used offline as it performs the analysis on the developer's local machine. This offline capability of SonarLint provides convenience and flexibility, especially in scenarios where the internet connection is unstable or not available.

In summary, DeepSource Analyzer focuses on static code analysis for a limited set of languages, integrates well with code hosting platforms, and is suitable for smaller projects. SonarLint, on the other hand, supports a wide range of languages, offers a comprehensive set of rules, integrates with IDEs, scales well for large projects, and can be used both online and offline.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarLint
SonarLint
DeepSource
DeepSource

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

DeepSource helps developers ship clean and secure code with powerful static analysis, OWASP Top 10 reporting, and Autofix. Trusted by thousands of startups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies.

Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Simple configuration; Continuous analysis; Fewer false-positives; Integration with existing tools; Know each issue in detail; Broad-spectrum of issue coverage.
Statistics
Stacks
175
Stacks
16
Followers
352
Followers
49
Votes
16
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
Pros
  • 3
    Free for open source
  • 3
    Easy setup and analysis
  • 2
    Autofixes for many lints for free
Cons
  • 1
    Test coverage % differs from actual
Integrations
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
C#
C#
Terraform
Terraform
Docker
Docker
Scala
Scala
GitHub
GitHub
JavaScript
JavaScript
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to SonarLint, DeepSource?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana