StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. DevSpace Cloud vs kaniko

DevSpace Cloud vs kaniko

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

kaniko
kaniko
Stacks44
Followers79
Votes4
GitHub Stars15.7K
Forks1.5K
DevSpace Cloud
DevSpace Cloud
Stacks2
Followers6
Votes0
GitHub Stars111
Forks15

DevSpace Cloud vs kaniko: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Integration with Kubernetes: DevSpace Cloud seamlessly integrates with Kubernetes clusters, allowing users to deploy and manage their applications directly within their Kubernetes environment, while kaniko does not provide this level of integration. This integration simplifies the deployment process and streamlines workflows for developers.

  2. Build Context Optimization: DevSpace Cloud optimizes the build context by automatically analyzing the dependencies of the project and only sending relevant files to the build process. In contrast, kaniko requires users to manually specify the build context, potentially leading to larger images and increased build times if not optimized correctly. This optimization feature in DevSpace Cloud enhances efficiency and reduces the overall build time.

  3. Centralized Build Management: DevSpace Cloud offers centralized build management capabilities, allowing users to track and manage all their builds in one place, monitor build progress, and view detailed logs easily. On the other hand, kaniko lacks this centralized build management system, which can make it challenging to track and manage project builds effectively, especially in a larger development environment.

  4. Built-in Image Registry Integration: DevSpace Cloud includes built-in integration with popular image registries like Docker Hub, allowing users to push their images directly from the platform. In comparison, kaniko requires users to set up and manage image registry integrations separately, adding an extra step to the workflow. This built-in integration simplifies the image sharing and distribution process for users.

  5. Resource Efficiency: DevSpace Cloud leverages shared caching and containerized build processes to maximize resource efficiency and minimize the overall build time for projects. This approach optimizes resource utilization and ensures faster builds, especially when multiple developers are working on different parts of the project simultaneously. In contrast, kaniko lacks these resource efficiency features, which can lead to longer build times and higher resource consumption.

  6. Secure Build Environment: DevSpace Cloud ensures a secure build environment by isolating builds in containers, providing control over the build process, and supporting fine-grained access control policies. This secure build environment enhances the overall security posture of the CI/CD pipeline and protects sensitive project data. Kaniko, on the other hand, may not offer the same level of security features and control over the build environment.

In Summary, DevSpace Cloud offers seamless Kubernetes integration, optimized build context, centralized build management, built-in image registry integration, resource efficiency, and a secure build environment, setting it apart from kaniko in enhancing development workflows and project deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

kaniko
kaniko
DevSpace Cloud
DevSpace Cloud

A tool to build container images from a Dockerfile, inside a container or Kubernetes cluster. kaniko doesn't depend on a Docker daemon and executes each command within a Dockerfile completely in userspace. This enables building container images in environments that can't easily or securely run a Docker daemon, such as a standard Kubernetes cluster.

It lets IT teams create an internal Kubernetes offering that enables their developer teams to create isolated namespaces in shared development clusters. The goal is to allow engineers to get access to Kubernetes in a self-service fashion. It restricts developers to their own namespaces allowing secure cluster sharing while handling all the admistrative overhead such as the management of the kube-context on an engineers machine.

Build container images in environments that can't easily or securely run a Docker daemon, such as a standard Kubernetes cluster
Strict Namespace Isolation and Secure Multi-Tenancy; Admin UI for Managing Users & Permissions; Optimized for Self-Service & Great Developer Experience; Cost Reduction via Automatic Sleep Mode for Namespaces; Optimized for Professional IT and Dev Teams
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.7K
GitHub Stars
111
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
15
Stacks
44
Stacks
2
Followers
79
Followers
6
Votes
4
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    No need for docker demon
  • 1
    Automation using jules
Cons
  • 1
    Slow compared to docker
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
Rancher
Rancher
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to kaniko, DevSpace Cloud?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana