StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. DevSpace for Kubernetes vs Docker Compose

DevSpace for Kubernetes vs Docker Compose

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K
DevSpace for Kubernetes
DevSpace for Kubernetes
Stacks16
Followers36
Votes0

DevSpace for Kubernetes vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?

  1. Ease of Use: DevSpace for Kubernetes provides a seamless and straightforward experience for deploying and developing applications on Kubernetes, offering a clear and easy-to-understand configuration syntax. On the other hand, Docker Compose requires developers to define services, networks, and volumes in separate files, which can become complex and harder to manage in larger projects.
  2. Image Building and Pushing: With DevSpace for Kubernetes, developers can build container images with a single command and push them to a chosen registry directly. Docker Compose, on the other hand, relies on external tools and manual steps for building and pushing Docker images, making the process more cumbersome and time-consuming.
  3. Multi-Stage Builds: DevSpace for Kubernetes supports multi-stage builds natively, allowing developers to optimize their container images by separating build dependencies from the final runtime environment. Docker Compose, on the other hand, lacks built-in support for multi-stage builds, requiring developers to employ workarounds or rely on external tools to achieve similar results.
  4. Live Development: DevSpace for Kubernetes enables live development by synchronizing local file changes with running containers seamlessly, providing instant feedback without the need to rebuild and redeploy the entire application. Docker Compose, in contrast, does not offer a built-in solution for live development, often requiring developers to rebuild and redeploy containers for every code change.
  5. DevSpace Profiles: DevSpace for Kubernetes introduces the concept of DevSpace profiles, which allows developers to define different deployment configurations for various environments (e.g., testing, staging, production) using the same project structure. Docker Compose, however, does not have an equivalent feature, making it harder to manage and switch between different deployment configurations.
  6. Automatic Dependency Resolution: DevSpace for Kubernetes automatically resolves and deploys application dependencies defined in package managers like npm, pip, or Maven, simplifying the deployment process and ensuring accurate dependencies in the Kubernetes environment. Docker Compose does not provide this level of automated dependency resolution, requiring developers to manually handle and install dependencies within the containers.

In Summary, DevSpace for Kubernetes offers a more user-friendly experience, streamlined image building and live development capabilities, native support for multi-stage builds, the concept of DevSpace profiles for managing different deployment configurations, and automated dependency resolution, setting it apart from Docker Compose in several key aspects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Compose
Docker Compose
DevSpace for Kubernetes
DevSpace for Kubernetes

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

It is an open-source developer tool for Kubernetes that lets you develop and deploy cloud-native software faster. It is a client-only CLI tool that runs on your machine and works with any Kubernetes cluster. You can use it to automate image building and deployments, to develop software directly inside Kubernetes and to streamline workflows across your team as well as across dev, staging and production.

-
Automated Image Building with devspace build; Automated Deployment with devspace deploy; Efficient In-Cluster Development with devspace dev; Feature-Rich Localhost Development UI with devspace ui; Lightweight (Client-Only); Easy to Setup; Extensive Customization via Profiles and Config Patches
Statistics
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
22.3K
Stacks
16
Followers
16.5K
Followers
36
Votes
501
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
Rancher
Rancher
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Docker Compose, DevSpace for Kubernetes?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana