StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Swarm Visualizer vs Lens

Docker Swarm Visualizer vs Lens

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Docker Swarm Visualizer
Docker Swarm Visualizer
Stacks25
Followers108
Votes3
Lens
Lens
Stacks151
Followers183
Votes9
GitHub Stars23.0K
Forks1.5K

Docker Swarm Visualizer vs Lens: What are the differences?

Docker Swarm Visualizer vs Lens

Introduction

In the world of container orchestration, both Docker Swarm Visualizer and Lens are popular tools used to manage Docker Swarm clusters. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two worth exploring.

1. User Interface:

Docker Swarm Visualizer provides a simple, graphical representation of the Docker Swarm cluster. It allows users to visualize the nodes, services, and tasks in a cluster using a web-based interface. On the other hand, Lens offers a more advanced user interface with additional features and functionalities. It provides a comprehensive view of the cluster, including real-time metrics, logs, and resource usage.

2. Monitoring and Analytics:

Docker Swarm Visualizer offers basic monitoring capabilities, allowing users to view the status of services and nodes in the cluster. However, it does not provide detailed metrics or analytics. In contrast, Lens goes beyond monitoring by offering advanced analytics and insights into the cluster's performance. It allows users to track resource consumption, identify bottlenecks, and analyze historical data.

3. Multi-cluster Support:

Docker Swarm Visualizer is primarily designed for visualizing single Docker Swarm clusters and does not support managing multiple clusters. On the other hand, Lens excels in managing multi-cluster environments. It allows users to easily switch between multiple clusters and provides a unified view for managing and monitoring them.

4. Extensibility and Customization:

Docker Swarm Visualizer provides limited options for customization and extensibility. Users can configure basic settings such as the refresh rate and node colors, but there are limited options for customization beyond that. In contrast, Lens is highly extensible and allows users to customize the interface, add custom dashboards, and integrate with third-party plugins. It provides a more flexible and customizable experience for users.

5. Integration with Other Tools:

Docker Swarm Visualizer does not offer direct integration with other tools or platforms. It is a standalone tool with limited integrations. On the other hand, Lens has built-in integrations with various popular DevOps tools and platforms. It can seamlessly integrate with Kubernetes, Helm, GitOps workflows, and more. This makes Lens a more preferred choice for users looking for a tool that integrates well within their existing DevOps ecosystem.

6. Community and Support:

Docker Swarm Visualizer has been widely adopted by the Docker Swarm community and has a large user base. However, it is not actively maintained by Docker. On the other hand, Lens is backed by Mirantis, a company known for its contributions to the Kubernetes ecosystem. Lens benefits from active development and continuous updates, ensuring a more reliable and supported tool.

Summary

In summary, Docker Swarm Visualizer and Lens differ in their user interface, monitoring capabilities, multi-cluster support, extensibility, integration options, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Docker Swarm Visualizer
Docker Swarm Visualizer
Lens
Lens

Each node in the swarm will show all tasks running on it. When a service goes down it'll be removed. When a node goes down it won't, instead the circle at the top will turn red to indicate it went down. Tasks will be removed.

It is the only IDE you’ll ever need to take control of your Kubernetes clusters. It is a standalone application for MacOS, Windows and Linux operating systems. It is open source and free.

-
Multi Cluster Management; Multiple Workspaces; Built-In Prometheus Stats; Built-in Helm Applications Management; Context Aware Terminal;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
23.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
25
Stacks
151
Followers
108
Followers
183
Votes
3
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to deploy
  • 1
    Stateless
  • 1
    Reverse proxy support
Pros
  • 4
    Keep track of cluster changes
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 2
    Easy management of multiple clusters
  • 1
    Local installation, not SaaS
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to Docker Swarm Visualizer, Lens?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana