Dumb-init vs minikube

Overview

Dumb-init

Stacks5

Followers19

Votes0

GitHub Stars7.2K

Forks356

minikube

Stacks110

Followers262

Votes3

GitHub Stars31.1K

Forks5.1K

Dumb-init vs minikube: What are the differences?

Resource Management: Dumb-init is primarily used as a simple init system for Docker containers, focusing on reaping zombie processes and forwarding signals, while minikube is a tool that sets up a single-node Kubernetes cluster locally.
Functionality: Dumb-init acts as a PID 1 process inside containers, ensuring that orphaned processes are properly reaped, whereas minikube enables users to run Kubernetes clusters on their local machine for testing and development purposes.
Deployment: Dumb-init is typically included in the Dockerfile of containerized applications to improve process management, while minikube is installed separately on the host machine to create a local Kubernetes environment.
Use Cases: Dumb-init is more suitable for managing processes within individual containers, ensuring they behave correctly in a containerized environment, whereas minikube is ideal for testing Kubernetes applications locally before deploying them in a production environment.
Community Support: Dumb-init is a smaller, specialized project with a focus on process management within containers, while minikube is a widely-used tool supported by the Kubernetes community for local development and testing of Kubernetes applications.
Scalability: Dumb-init is designed for smaller-scale applications where process management is critical, while minikube is capable of providing a platform for testing and development of larger, more complex Kubernetes applications.

In Summary, Dumb-init is focused on managing processes within containers with a simple init system, while minikube is used for setting up local Kubernetes clusters for testing and development purposes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Dumb-init	minikube
dumb-init runs as PID 1, acting like a simple init system. It launches a single process and then proxies all received signals to a session rooted at that child process. Since your actual process is no longer PID 1, when it receives signals from dumb-init, the default signal handlers will be applied, and your process will behave as you would expect. If your process dies, dumb-init will also die, taking care to clean up any other processes that might still remain.	It implements a local Kubernetes cluster on macOS, Linux, and Windows. Its goal is to be the tool for local Kubernetes application development and to support all Kubernetes features that fit.
Acts like a simple init system, Runs as PID1 instead of your process	Local Kubernetes; LoadBalancer; Multi-cluster
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.2K	GitHub Stars 31.1K
GitHub Forks 356	GitHub Forks 5.1K
Stacks 5	Stacks 110
Followers 19	Followers 262
Votes 0	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Let's me test k8s config locally 1 Easy setup 1 Can use same yaml config I'll use for prod deployment
Integrations
Docker	Windows Linux macOS

What are some alternatives to Dumb-init, minikube?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

Dumb-init vs minikube: What are the differences?

Resource Management: Dumb-init is primarily used as a simple init system for Docker containers, focusing on reaping zombie processes and forwarding signals, while minikube is a tool that sets up a single-node Kubernetes cluster locally.
Functionality: Dumb-init acts as a PID 1 process inside containers, ensuring that orphaned processes are properly reaped, whereas minikube enables users to run Kubernetes clusters on their local machine for testing and development purposes.
Deployment: Dumb-init is typically included in the Dockerfile of containerized applications to improve process management, while minikube is installed separately on the host machine to create a local Kubernetes environment.
Use Cases: Dumb-init is more suitable for managing processes within individual containers, ensuring they behave correctly in a containerized environment, whereas minikube is ideal for testing Kubernetes applications locally before deploying them in a production environment.
Community Support: Dumb-init is a smaller, specialized project with a focus on process management within containers, while minikube is a widely-used tool supported by the Kubernetes community for local development and testing of Kubernetes applications.
Scalability: Dumb-init is designed for smaller-scale applications where process management is critical, while minikube is capable of providing a platform for testing and development of larger, more complex Kubernetes applications.

Dumb-init vs minikube

Overview