StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Mobile Testing Frameworks
  5. EarlGrey vs Experitest

EarlGrey vs Experitest

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

EarlGrey
EarlGrey
Stacks40
Followers43
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.7K
Forks740
Experitest
Experitest
Stacks8
Followers37
Votes0

EarlGrey vs Experitest: What are the differences?

Developers describe EarlGrey as "iOS UI Automation Test Framework, by Google". EarlGrey is a native iOS UI automation test framework that enables you to write clear, concise tests. With the EarlGrey framework, you have access to enhanced synchronization features. EarlGrey automatically synchronizes with the UI, network requests, and various queues; but still allows you to manually implement customized timings, if needed. On the other hand, Experitest is detailed as "A provider of quality assurance tools for mobile DevOps". It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics..

EarlGrey and Experitest can be categorized as "Mobile Testing Frameworks" tools.

Some of the features offered by EarlGrey are:

  • Synchronization
  • Visibility Checks
  • User-Like Interaction

On the other hand, Experitest provides the following key features:

  • Live mobile app testing
  • Automated mobile app testing
  • Live cross-browser testing

EarlGrey is an open source tool with 4.78K GitHub stars and 627 GitHub forks. Here's a link to EarlGrey's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

EarlGrey
EarlGrey
Experitest
Experitest

EarlGrey is a native iOS UI automation test framework that enables you to write clear, concise tests. With the EarlGrey framework, you have access to enhanced synchronization features. EarlGrey automatically synchronizes with the UI, network requests, and various queues; but still allows you to manually implement customized timings, if needed.

It allows users to create and run Appium, Selenium, XCUITest & Espresso tests against real devices and web browsers. Users can create & execute hundreds of manual or automated tests in parallel on IOS & Android devices. Users can automate their cross-browser testing, perform visual testing and access advanced analytics.

Synchronization;Visibility Checks;User-Like Interaction
Live mobile app testing; Automated mobile app testing; Live cross-browser testing; Automated cross-browser testing; Visual testing; Global data centers; Test development; Open source compatibility; Large scale test execution; Integrations with CI tools; Integrations with development and testing tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
740
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
40
Stacks
8
Followers
43
Followers
37
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Bamboo
Bamboo
Java
Java
C#
C#
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
TestNG
TestNG
Ruby
Ruby
Eclipse
Eclipse
Selenium
Selenium

What are some alternatives to EarlGrey, Experitest?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Appium

Appium

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana