WCF vs ejabberd

Overview

ejabberd

Stacks33

Followers48

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.5K

Forks1.5K

WCF

Stacks125

Followers107

Votes5

ejabberd vs WCF: What are the differences?

Developers describe ejabberd as "A scalable and robust instant messaging server". It is a distributed, fault-tolerant technology that allows the creation of large-scale instant messaging applications. The server can reliably support thousands of simultaneous users on a single node and has been designed to provide exceptional standards of fault tolerance. On the other hand, WCF is detailed as "A runtime and a set of APIs for building connected, service-oriented applications". It is a framework for building service-oriented applications. Using this, you can send data as asynchronous messages from one service endpoint to another. A service endpoint can be part of a continuously available service hosted by IIS, or it can be a service hosted in an application.

ejabberd and WCF are primarily classified as "Message Queue" and "Realtime Backend / API" tools respectively.

ejabberd is an open source tool with 4.18K GitHub stars and 1.25K GitHub forks. Here's a link to ejabberd's open source repository on GitHub.

Bluebeam Software, Heimdal Security, and ticketportal are some of the popular companies that use WCF, whereas ejabberd is used by AppScale Systems, KongHack Inc., and UrbanClap. WCF has a broader approval, being mentioned in 15 company stacks & 15 developers stacks; compared to ejabberd, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

ejabberd	WCF
It is a distributed, fault-tolerant technology that allows the creation of large-scale instant messaging applications. The server can reliably support thousands of simultaneous users on a single node and has been designed to provide exceptional standards of fault tolerance.	It is a framework for building service-oriented applications. Using this, you can send data as asynchronous messages from one service endpoint to another. A service endpoint can be part of a continuously available service hosted by IIS, or it can be a service hosted in an application.
Cross-platform; Administrator-friendly; Internationalized; Fault-tolerant	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 6.5K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 33	Stacks 125
Followers 48	Followers 107
Votes 0	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 5 Classes
Integrations
PostgreSQL Linux MySQL Mac OS X	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to ejabberd, WCF?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.