StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. Emacs vs gedit

Emacs vs gedit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Emacs
Emacs
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.2K
Votes322
gedit
gedit
Stacks64
Followers101
Votes48

Emacs vs gedit: What are the differences?

Introduction

Below are the key differences between Emacs and gedit:

  1. Customization and Extensibility: Emacs is known for its high level of customization and extensibility. It offers a powerful scripting language called Emacs Lisp, which allows users to tailor the editor to their specific needs. On the other hand, gedit provides limited customization options compared to Emacs and does not have a built-in scripting language.

  2. Operating System Compatibility: Emacs is compatible with various operating systems, including macOS, Linux, and Windows. It has a consistent user interface across different platforms. In contrast, gedit is primarily developed for GNOME-based Linux systems, although it can be installed on other platforms as well.

  3. Integrated Development Environment (IDE) Features: Emacs comes with a wide range of built-in features that make it suitable for development tasks. It provides advanced functionality for programming languages, such as syntax highlighting, code navigation, code completion, and debugging integration. While gedit also supports some IDE features like syntax highlighting, it is not as feature-rich as Emacs in terms of development capabilities.

  4. Learning Curve: Emacs has a steep learning curve due to its extensive customization options and complex command set. Users need to invest time in learning the different commands and customizing their workflow. In contrast, gedit is relatively easier to learn and has a more straightforward user interface, making it ideal for users who prefer simplicity and minimal configuration.

  5. Memory Footprint: Emacs, being highly extensible and customizable, tends to have a larger memory footprint compared to gedit. It can consume significant system resources, especially when using packages and modes that add advanced functionality. Gedit, being a simpler text editor, has a smaller memory footprint and is generally more lightweight.

  6. Community Support: Emacs has a large and active community of users and developers who contribute to its development and provide support through forums, mailing lists, and online resources. This allows users to find solutions to their issues and get help in customizing Emacs to their liking. While gedit also has a community, it may not be as extensive or active as the Emacs community, resulting in relatively limited support options.

In summary, Emacs offers extensive customization and extensibility options, cross-platform compatibility, advanced IDE features, a steep learning curve, a larger memory footprint, and a thriving community. On the other hand, gedit provides limited customization options, primarily targets GNOME-based Linux systems, has basic IDE features, an easier learning curve, a smaller memory footprint, and a comparatively smaller community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Emacs
Emacs
gedit
gedit

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

gedit is the GNOME text editor. While aiming at simplicity and ease of use, gedit is a powerful general purpose text editor.

Content-sensitive editing modes, including syntax coloring, for a variety of file types including plain text, source code, and HTML.;Complete built-in documentation, including a tutorial for new users.;Full Unicode support for nearly all human languages and their scripts.;Highly customizable, using Emacs Lisp code or a graphical interface.;A large number of extensions that add other functionality, including a project planner, mail and news reader, debugger interface, calendar, and more. Many of these extensions are distributed with GNU Emacs others are available separately.
Full support for internationalized text (UTF-8);Configurable syntax highlighting for various languages (C, C++, Java, HTML, XML, Python, Perl and many others);Undo/Redo;Editing files from remote locations;File reverting;Print and print preview support;Clipboard support (cut/copy/paste);Search and replace;Go to specific line;Auto indentation;Text wrapping;Line numbers;Right margin;Current line highlighting;Bracket matching;Backup files;Configurable fonts and colors;A complete online user manual;A flexible plugin system which can be used to dynamically add new advanced features
Statistics
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
64
Followers
1.2K
Followers
101
Votes
322
Votes
48
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 65
    Vast array of extensions
  • 44
    Have all you can imagine
  • 40
    Everything i need in one place
  • 39
    Portability
  • 32
    Customer config
Cons
  • 4
    So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked
  • 4
    Hard to learn for beginners
  • 1
    Not default preinstalled in GNU/linux
Pros
  • 10
    Fast
  • 9
    GNOME Integration
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Syntax Highlighting
  • 3
    Immediately starts
Cons
  • 2
    GTK3

What are some alternatives to Emacs, gedit?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

VSCodium

VSCodium

It is a community-driven, freely-licensed binary distribution of Microsoft’s editor VSCode.

TextMate

TextMate

TextMate brings Apple's approach to operating systems into the world of text editors. By bridging UNIX underpinnings and GUI, TextMate cherry-picks the best of both worlds to the benefit of expert scripters and novice users alike.

Kakoune

Kakoune

Kakoune is a code editor heavily inspired by Vim, as such most of its commands are similar to vi’s ones. Kakoune can operate in two modes, normal and insertion. In insertion mode, keys are directly inserted into the current buffer. In normal mode, keys are used to manipulate the current selection and to enter insertion mode.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana