StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Firebase Authentication vs ORY Kratos

Firebase Authentication vs ORY Kratos

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
Stacks533
Followers610
Votes55
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos
Stacks14
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.5K
Forks1.1K

Firebase Authentication vs ORY Kratos: What are the differences?

Introduction

Firebase Authentication and ORY Kratos are both popular authentication platforms for websites and applications. However, they have key differences that set them apart from each other. In this section, I will outline six specific differences between Firebase Authentication and ORY Kratos.

  1. User Management: Firebase Authentication offers a comprehensive user management system. It provides features like user creation, sign-in with email/password, social login integration, and password reset. On the other hand, ORY Kratos focuses more on identity management and does not provide out-of-the-box user management features such as user creation and password reset.

  2. Customizability: Firebase Authentication offers a degree of customizability through the Firebase Authentication UI, which can be branded to match the website or application. ORY Kratos, on the other hand, provides highly customizable and extensible authentication workflows, allowing developers to tailor the user journey to their specific requirements.

  3. Integration with Other Services: Firebase Authentication seamlessly integrates with other Firebase services such as Cloud Firestore and Cloud Functions, providing a complete backend solution. ORY Kratos, on the other hand, is designed to be integrated with existing systems and services, making it suitable for more complex and diverse architectures.

  4. Identity Providers: Firebase Authentication supports a wide range of identity providers out of the box, including Google, Facebook, Twitter, and GitHub. ORY Kratos also supports multiple identity providers but requires additional configuration and integration efforts to support specific providers.

  5. Server Requirements: Firebase Authentication is a cloud-based service provided by Google, which means developers do not need to maintain server resources for authentication. ORY Kratos, on the other hand, requires server setup and maintenance, making it more suitable for organizations that have the resources to manage their own infrastructure.

  6. Pricing Model: Firebase Authentication follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where developers are billed based on the number of monthly active users. ORY Kratos is an open-source solution, offering free usage but requiring developers to manage their infrastructure costs.

In Summary, Firebase Authentication provides a more comprehensive user management system, seamless integration with other Firebase services, and a pay-as-you-go pricing model, while ORY Kratos offers a high degree of customizability, extensibility, and the ability to integrate with existing systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Firebase Authentication
Firebase Authentication
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

It is a cloud native user management system. It provides user login and registration, multi-factor authentication, and user information storage with a headless API. It is fully configurable and supports a wide range of protocols such as Google Authenticator, and stores user information using JSON Schema.

-
Self-service Login and Registration; Multi-Factor Authentication; Account Verification; Account Recovery; Profile and Account Management
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
533
Stacks
14
Followers
610
Followers
99
Votes
55
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Completely Free
  • 8
    Email/Password
  • 8
    Native App + Web integrations
  • 7
    Passwordless
  • 6
    Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
Cons
  • 6
    Heavy webpack
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
Java
Java
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Firebase Authentication, ORY Kratos?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope