FitNesse vs Selenide

Overview

FitNesse

Stacks32

Followers62

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.1K

Forks712

Selenide

Stacks57

Followers85

Votes16

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

FitNesse vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Developers describe FitNesse as "The fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework". It is an open source project. The code base is not owned by any company. A lot of information is shared by the FitNesse community. It's extremely adaptable and is used in areas ranging from Web/GUI tests to testing electronic components. On the other hand, Selenide is detailed as "Concise UI tests in JAVA". It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

FitNesse and Selenide can be categorized as "Testing Frameworks" tools.

Some of the features offered by FitNesse are:

FitNesse is an easy to use wiki web server
Easy to set up: just download the application (a Java jar file) and start it
Specifications/requirements can be used as test input

On the other hand, Selenide provides the following key features:

Concise fluent API for tests
Ajax support for stable tests
Powerful selectors

FitNesse is an open source tool with 1.4K GitHub stars and 603 GitHub forks. Here's a link to FitNesse's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in Testing Frameworks on StackShare

Oglama™

Testing Frameworks

Oglama

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Advice on FitNesse, Selenide

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

FitNesse	Selenide
It is an open source project. The code base is not owned by any company. A lot of information is shared by the FitNesse community. It's extremely adaptable and is used in areas ranging from Web/GUI tests to testing electronic components.	It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.
FitNesse is an easy to use wiki web server;Easy to set up: just download the application (a Java jar file) and start it;Specifications/requirements can be used as test input;The major languages are supported	Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.1K	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks 712	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 32	Stacks 57
Followers 62	Followers 85
Votes 0	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 5 Nice JAVA API 2 Integrated with WebDriverManager project 2 Very mature API 2 File upload support 2 Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework Cons 1 Hybrid page model not possible
Integrations
Karate DSL Java	BrowserStack Android Studio Selendroid Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to FitNesse, Selenide?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.