StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Static Web Hosting
  5. Forge vs Netlify

Forge vs Netlify

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Forge
Forge
Stacks10
Followers24
Votes1
Netlify
Netlify
Stacks3.6K
Followers2.1K
Votes207

Forge vs Netlify: What are the differences?

Forge and Netlify are both popular platforms for deploying web applications. Despite serving a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two that users should consider.
  1. Ease of Use: Netlify is known for its user-friendly interface and easy setup process. Users can simply drag and drop their files to deploy a website, while Forge may require more technical knowledge and configuration.

  2. Integrations: Netlify offers a wide range of integrations with popular tools and services like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing for seamless deployment workflows. Forge, on the other hand, may have limited integration options.

  3. Scalability: Netlify is renowned for its scalability, offering automatic scaling based on traffic spikes and usage. Forge may have limitations in terms of scalability and may require users to manually adjust resources.

  4. Cost: Netlify offers a free tier with generous features, making it an attractive option for small projects and personal websites. Forge may have a different pricing structure or fewer free options.

  5. Version Control: Netlify has robust version control capabilities, allowing users to easily revert to previous versions of their deployed websites. Forge may have limited version control features or require additional tools for this function.

  6. Server Management: Netlify abstracts away server management from users, handling all the backend infrastructure. Forge may require users to have more control and responsibility over server configurations and maintenance.

In Summary, while both Forge and Netlify offer web deployment services, Netlify excels in ease of use, integrations, scalability, and version control, whereas Forge may require more technical expertise and manual configurations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Forge, Netlify

Howie
Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

DecidedonNetlifyNetlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Forge
Forge
Netlify
Netlify

Fastest possible way to host lighting-fast static websites for small businesses, web startups, and app developers.

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Drag & Drop, or sync with Dropbox or GitHub; Version Based History; Optimized for Speed; Collaborate with Others; Live Site Previews; File differences;
Global Network;Global Network;Instant Cache Validation;Atomic Deploys;API proxying;SSL for custom domains;Continuous Deployment;Link to Github or Bitbucket
Statistics
Stacks
10
Stacks
3.6K
Followers
24
Followers
2.1K
Votes
1
Votes
207
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Fgfgf
Pros
  • 48
    Easy deploy
  • 43
    Fastest static hosting and continuous deployments
  • 23
    Free SSL support
  • 23
    Super simple deploys
  • 16
    Easy Setup and Continous deployments
Cons
  • 7
    It's expensive
  • 1
    Bandwidth limitation
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Dropbox
Dropbox
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to Forge, Netlify?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

GitLab Pages

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Firebase Hosting

Firebase Hosting

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

Runkod

Runkod

It provides decentralized hosting platform and management tools for modern javascript applications and static web publishing.

BitBalloon

BitBalloon

BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope