Fork vs Tower

Overview

Tower

Stacks214

Followers360

Votes80

Fork

Stacks197

Followers258

Votes126

Fork vs Tower: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Fork and Tower

Fork and Tower are both popular Git client software that offer different features and functionalities. Here are the key differences between Fork and Tower:

User Interface:
- Fork: Fork provides a more modern and intuitive user interface, making it easier for users to navigate through different features and options.
- Tower: Tower has a more traditional and app-like user interface, providing a familiar experience for users who are accustomed to other software.
Platform Compatibility:
- Fork: Fork is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems, allowing users to work on their preferred platform.
- Tower: Tower is primarily designed for macOS users, with limited support for other platforms.
Cloud Integration:
- Fork: Fork offers integrated support for popular cloud platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing users to easily clone repositories, track changes, and collaborate with team members.
- Tower: Tower also offers cloud integration with platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket, but lacks support for GitLab.
Price and Licensing:
- Fork: Fork offers a free version with limited features, as well as a paid version with advanced functionalities for individuals and teams.
- Tower: Tower is a commercial software that requires a paid license for full access to all its features and capabilities.
Advanced Features:
- Fork: Fork provides advanced features such as conflict resolution, interactive rebase, automatic stashing, and support for submodule management.
- Tower: Tower also offers similar advanced features, including conflict resolution, interactive rebase, and submodule support, but may offer a more refined and polished user experience.
Customizability:
- Fork: Fork allows users to customize their workflows and preferences with options for keyboard shortcuts, user-defined templates, and color themes.
- Tower: Tower provides limited customization options compared to Fork, with fewer settings available for users to personalize their experience.

In summary, Fork and Tower differ in terms of user interface, platform compatibility, cloud integration, pricing, advanced features, and customizability. Users should choose based on their specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Tower, Fork

Stefan

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.

It allows

to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie)
it helps to investigate the history
most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Tower	Fork
Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.	Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.
Clone & create repos with a click - Manage your GitHub, Bitbucket & Beanstalk accounts from within Tower;Open repos quickly - Tower's "Quick Open" dialog finds and opens repositories in no time;Automate the boring stuff - Fetching and stashing are automatically done for you, if you wish;Clone in the background- Downloading large projects happens in the background, while you work;Multiple windows - Have multiple projects open side-by-side	-
Statistics
Stacks 214	Stacks 197
Followers 360	Followers 258
Votes 80	Votes 126
Pros & Cons
Pros 19 Git 16 Just works 10 Version control 6 Simple layout 6 Awesome Cons 5 Expensive 4 Subscription based 1 No side by side diff 0 Merge conflict resolution impossible/unclear	Pros 19 One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs 14 Nice UX 13 Does the job way better than others 13 Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast 11 Dark theme Cons 2 Poorly written license 1 Merges that require interactive user decision 1 Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history
Integrations
Bitbucket TextMate Visual Studio GitHub GitLab Git Xcode Gerrit Code Review Beanstalk	Git

What are some alternatives to Tower, Fork?

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

GitKraken

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Sublime Merge

A snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits.

GitUp

GitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting.

SmartGit

SmartGit is a powerful Git GUI client with support for GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab and Azure DevOps. SmartGit runs on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana