StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Git-appraise vs Prettier

Git-appraise vs Prettier

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Git-appraise
Git-appraise
Stacks4
Followers27
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks143
Prettier
Prettier
Stacks13.2K
Followers1.3K
Votes7
GitHub Stars51.1K
Forks4.6K

Git-appraise vs Prettier: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of software development, tools like Git-appraise and Prettier play a crucial role in enhancing code quality and collaboration. Understanding the key differences between these two tools is essential for developers to choose the right tool for their specific needs.

1. Integration with Git Workflow: Git-appraise integrates seamlessly with Git workflow, allowing developers to approve, comment, and merge code changes directly within the version control system. On the other hand, Prettier focuses on code formatting and does not offer the same level of integration with the Git workflow.

2. Code Formatting vs. Code Review: Prettier is primarily a code formatter that enforces consistent code style by automatically formatting code based on predefined rules. In contrast, Git-appraise is designed for code review purposes, facilitating feedback, discussions, and approvals on code changes before merging them into the main branch.

3. Collaboration and Communication: Git-appraise fosters collaboration among team members by providing a platform for meaningful code reviews and discussions. While Prettier focuses on maintaining consistent code styling, it does not offer the same level of communication and collaboration features as Git-appraise.

4. Manual vs. Automated Processes: Git-appraise relies on manual processes for code reviews, where developers need to explicitly request reviews and provide feedback. On the contrary, Prettier automates the code formatting process, reducing the need for manual interventions in maintaining code style consistency.

5. Customization and Flexibility: Prettier allows developers to configure and customize code formatting rules according to their preferences and project requirements. In comparison, Git-appraise focuses on standardizing the code review process and may have limited flexibility in terms of customization.

6. Focus on Code Quality vs. Code Style: Git-appraise prioritizes code quality by emphasizing thorough code reviews, feedback, and approval processes to ensure the integrity and reliability of code changes. In contrast, Prettier emphasizes code style consistency, aiming to improve code readability and maintainability through automated formatting.

In Summary, Git-appraise is tailored for code review and collaboration within the Git workflow, while Prettier is focused on automated code formatting and maintaining consistent code style.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Git-appraise, Prettier

Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Git-appraise
Git-appraise
Prettier
Prettier

This is a distributed code review system for Git. Code reviews are stored inside the repository as git objects that can be pushed and pulled to remote repos. When pulling, updates from the remote are automatically merged by the tool.

Prettier is an opinionated code formatter. It enforces a consistent style by parsing your code and re-printing it with its own rules that take the maximum line length into account, wrapping code when necessary.

Code review requests; Continuous integration status; Robot comments (generated by static analysis tool); Review comments (generated by person)
An opinionated code formatter; Supports many languages; Integrates with most editors; Has few options; You press save and code is formatted; No need to discuss style in code review; Saves you time and energy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
51.1K
GitHub Forks
143
GitHub Forks
4.6K
Stacks
4
Stacks
13.2K
Followers
27
Followers
1.3K
Votes
0
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Customizable
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Completely free
  • 1
    Runs offline
  • 1
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
Integrations
Git
Git
Jenkins
Jenkins
Eclipse
Eclipse
GitHub
GitHub
Phabricator
Phabricator
GraphQL
GraphQL
JavaScript
JavaScript
TypeScript
TypeScript
Flow
Flow
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
markdown
markdown
YAML
YAML
Less
Less

What are some alternatives to Git-appraise, Prettier?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana