Gitbook vs Read the Docs

Overview

Read the Docs

Stacks71

Followers289

Votes22

Gitbook

Stacks219

Followers352

Votes10

Gitbook vs Read the Docs: What are the differences?

Gitbook and Read the Docs are both popular documentation platforms that provide a way to create and host documentation for software projects. While they serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

Integration with Version Control: Gitbook offers direct integration with Git repositories, allowing users to sync their documentation with changes made in their codebase. On the other hand, Read the Docs requires a separate build process to generate and host documentation, which can be less seamless.
Customization Options: Gitbook provides a more flexible and customizable platform for documentation. Users can easily customize the layout, design, and structure of their documentation to match their brand or project needs. In contrast, Read the Docs has a more limited set of customization options, mainly focusing on the content itself rather than the overall look and feel.
Hosting Options: Gitbook offers both cloud hosting and self-hosting options, giving users more control over their documentation hosting. Users can choose to host their documentation on Gitbook's servers or host it on their own infrastructure. Read the Docs, on the other hand, primarily focuses on cloud hosting and does not provide a self-hosting option.
Collaboration Features: Gitbook includes collaboration features that allow multiple contributors to work together on the documentation. It provides tools for real-time collaboration, version history, and commenting, making it easier for teams to collaborate on the documentation. Read the Docs, on the other hand, lacks these built-in collaboration features.
Inline Code Samples: Gitbook supports the inclusion of inline code samples directly in the documentation, making it easier to demonstrate and explain complex code concepts. Read the Docs, while it does support code examples, does not offer the same level of integration for inline code samples.
Search Functionality: Gitbook provides a robust search functionality, allowing users to easily search through the documentation for specific keywords or phrases. This can be particularly useful for larger documentation projects. Read the Docs also offers search functionality, but it may not be as advanced or customizable as Gitbook's search features.

In summary, Gitbook offers better integration with version control, more customization options, flexible hosting options, collaboration features, support for inline code samples, and advanced search functionality compared to Read the Docs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Read the Docs	Gitbook
It hosts documentation, making it fully searchable and easy to find. You can import your docs using any major version control system, including Mercurial, Git, Subversion, and Bazaar.	It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.
Github and Bitbucket Integration;Auto-updating;Internationalization;Canonical URLs; Versions;Version Control Support Matrix;PDF Generation;Search;Alternate Domains	-
Statistics
Stacks 71	Stacks 219
Followers 289	Followers 352
Votes 22	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 GitHub integration 7 Free for public repos 2 Automated Builds	Pros 6 Prueba 4 Integrated high-quality editor Cons 1 Just sync with GitHub 1 No longer Git or Open
Integrations
GitHub Bitbucket Evernote Dropbox	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Read the Docs, Gitbook?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Gelato.io

Gelato.io is a SaaS tool for creating API documentation and developer portals.

MireDot

Generate REST documentation directly from your Java source code. This ensures always up-to-date and accurate documentation with minimal effort.

Slate

Slate helps you create beautiful API documentation. Think of it as an intelligent, responsive documentation template for your API.

jsdoc

JSDoc 3 is an API documentation generator for JavaScript, similar to JavaDoc or PHPDoc. You add documentation comments directly to your source code, right along side the code itself. The JSDoc Tool will scan your source code, and generate a complete HTML documentation website for you.

Ardoq

Ardoq's out of the box visualizations are automatically created in real-time. All changes and relationships are visualized simultaneously and are context sensitive. With Ardoq, you can see your documentation in the perspectives that best suit your needs.

Related Comparisons

Gitbook vs Read the Docs: What are the differences?

Integration with Version Control: Gitbook offers direct integration with Git repositories, allowing users to sync their documentation with changes made in their codebase. On the other hand, Read the Docs requires a separate build process to generate and host documentation, which can be less seamless.
Customization Options: Gitbook provides a more flexible and customizable platform for documentation. Users can easily customize the layout, design, and structure of their documentation to match their brand or project needs. In contrast, Read the Docs has a more limited set of customization options, mainly focusing on the content itself rather than the overall look and feel.
Hosting Options: Gitbook offers both cloud hosting and self-hosting options, giving users more control over their documentation hosting. Users can choose to host their documentation on Gitbook's servers or host it on their own infrastructure. Read the Docs, on the other hand, primarily focuses on cloud hosting and does not provide a self-hosting option.
Collaboration Features: Gitbook includes collaboration features that allow multiple contributors to work together on the documentation. It provides tools for real-time collaboration, version history, and commenting, making it easier for teams to collaborate on the documentation. Read the Docs, on the other hand, lacks these built-in collaboration features.
Inline Code Samples: Gitbook supports the inclusion of inline code samples directly in the documentation, making it easier to demonstrate and explain complex code concepts. Read the Docs, while it does support code examples, does not offer the same level of integration for inline code samples.
Search Functionality: Gitbook provides a robust search functionality, allowing users to easily search through the documentation for specific keywords or phrases. This can be particularly useful for larger documentation projects. Read the Docs also offers search functionality, but it may not be as advanced or customizable as Gitbook's search features.

Gitbook vs Read the Docs

Overview