StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Google Cloud Data Fusion vs StreamSets

Google Cloud Data Fusion vs StreamSets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

StreamSets
StreamSets
Stacks53
Followers133
Votes0
Google Cloud Data Fusion
Google Cloud Data Fusion
Stacks25
Followers156
Votes1

Google Cloud Data Fusion vs StreamSets: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of data integration tools, Google Cloud Data Fusion and StreamSets are two prominent platforms that offer unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these tools is essential for organizations to make informed decisions on which solution best suits their data integration needs.

  1. Architecture: Google Cloud Data Fusion is a fully managed, cloud-native data integration service based on the open-source project CDAP (Cask Data Application Platform), allowing users to build data pipelines using a visual interface. On the other hand, StreamSets is an open-core platform that can be deployed on-premises or on the cloud, providing users with a flexible architecture to design and manage data pipelines.

  2. Connectivity: Google Cloud Data Fusion offers a wide range of connectors to various data sources and destinations within the Google Cloud ecosystem, enabling seamless integration with services like BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and more. StreamSets, on the other hand, provides a broader set of connectors to integrate with a variety of on-premises and cloud data sources, including databases, messaging systems, and analytics platforms.

  3. Real-time Processing: StreamSets specializes in real-time data processing, allowing users to design and deploy pipelines that can ingest, process, and deliver data in real-time, making it ideal for use cases requiring low-latency data integration. Google Cloud Data Fusion also supports near-real-time processing but may not offer the same level of real-time capabilities as StreamSets in terms of performance and scalability.

  4. Cost Structure: Google Cloud Data Fusion follows a consumption-based pricing model, where users pay for the resources and services they use, making it scalable and cost-effective for organizations with varying data integration needs. StreamSets offers both open-source and commercial editions, providing users with the flexibility to choose a pricing plan that aligns with their budget and requirements.

  5. Community Support: StreamSets has an active community of users and contributors, offering a wide range of resources, forums, and extensions to help users troubleshoot issues, share best practices, and enhance the platform's capabilities. While Google Cloud Data Fusion benefits from Google's extensive cloud ecosystem and support, it may have a more limited community compared to StreamSets in terms of user-generated content and community-driven innovations.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Google Cloud Data Fusion and StreamSets in terms of architecture, connectivity, real-time processing, cost structure, and community support is crucial for organizations to choose the right data integration platform that aligns with their specific requirements and goals.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

StreamSets
StreamSets
Google Cloud Data Fusion
Google Cloud Data Fusion

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

A fully managed, cloud-native data integration service that helps users efficiently build and manage ETL/ELT data pipelines. With a graphical interface and a broad open-source library of preconfigured connectors and transformations, and more.

Only StreamSets provides a single design experience for all design patterns (batch, streaming, CDC, ETL, ELT, and ML pipelines) for 10x greater developer productivity; smart data pipelines that are resilient to change for 80% less breakages; and a single pane of glass for managing and monitoring all pipelines across hybrid and cloud architectures to eliminate blind spots and control gaps.
Code-free self-service; Collaborative data engineering; GCP-native; Enterprise-grade security; Integration metadata and lineage; Seamless operations; Comprehensive integration toolkit; Hybrid enablement
Statistics
Stacks
53
Stacks
25
Followers
133
Followers
156
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 2
    No user community
  • 1
    Crashes
Pros
  • 1
    Lower total cost of pipeline ownership
Integrations
HBase
HBase
Databricks
Databricks
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
gRPC
gRPC
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery

What are some alternatives to StreamSets, Google Cloud Data Fusion?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase