StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Hudson vs Strider

Hudson vs Strider

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Strider
Strider
Stacks21
Followers38
Votes11
GitHub Stars4.6K
Forks426
Hudson
Hudson
Stacks12
Followers18
Votes0

Hudson vs Strider: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will highlight the key differences between Hudson and Strider in the context of continuous integration tools.

1. **Architecture**: Hudson is a standalone Java program while Strider is a Node.js application. This fundamental difference in the architecture of the two tools affects the set up and deployment process, as well as the underlying technology stack required for their operation.
   
2. **Plugins**: Hudson has a broader range of plugins available in its ecosystem, offering more flexibility and customization options for users. On the other hand, Strider has a more limited selection of plugins but focuses on providing essential functionalities out of the box, promoting simplicity and efficiency.
   
3. **Scalability**: Strider is designed with scalability in mind, allowing users to easily scale up their CI/CD pipelines as their projects grow in complexity and scope. Hudson, while capable of handling large projects, may require more configuration and optimization for optimal scalability.
   
4. **User Interface**: Hudson is known for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate and configure their CI/CD workflows. Strider, on the other hand, prioritizes efficiency over visual aesthetics, offering a straightforward but less visually appealing user interface.
   
5. **Community Support**: Hudson has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community forums for support and collaboration. Strider, being a newer tool, may have a smaller community but offers more direct support channels and active development updates.
   
6. **Integration Capabilities**: Strider integrates seamlessly with popular version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and GitHub, providing a streamlined workflow for developers. Hudson also offers robust integration capabilities but may require additional configuration for certain version control systems.

In Summary, the key differences between Hudson and Strider lie in their architecture, plugin ecosystem, scalability, user interface, community support, and integration capabilities, catering to different user preferences and project requirements in the realm of continuous integration tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Strider
Strider
Hudson
Hudson

Strider is an Open Source Continuous Deployment / Continuous Integration platform. It is written in Node.JS / JavaScript and uses MongoDB as a backing store. It is published under the BSD license.

It monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently it focuses on the two jobs

add hooks to perform arbitrary actions during build.;modify the database schema to add custom fields.;register their own HTTP routes.;subscribe to and emit socket events.;create or modify user interfaces within Strider.
Easy installation; Easy configuration; Change set support; Permanent links; RSS/E-mail/IM Integration; After-the-fact tagging; JUnit/TestNG test reporting; Distributed builds; File fingerprinting; Plugin Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
426
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
21
Stacks
12
Followers
38
Followers
18
Votes
11
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Free Open Source
  • 5
    Hosted Internally
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Java
Java
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Strider, Hudson?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana