Hydra Framework vs Spring Boot

Overview

Spring Boot

Stacks26.7K

Followers24.3K

Votes1.0K

GitHub Stars78.9K

Forks41.6K

Hydra Framework

Stacks14

Followers48

Votes6

GitHub Stars9.9K

Forks723

Hydra Framework vs Spring Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here we will discuss the key differences between Hydra Framework and Spring Boot.

ApplicationContext: Hydra Framework uses HydraApplicationContext, which is a custom implementation of the ApplicationContext interface, to manage the application's components and provide dependency injection. On the other hand, Spring Boot uses the AnnotationConfigApplicationContext to enable component scanning and automatically configure the application based on annotations.
Auto Configuration: Hydra Framework does not provide auto-configuration capabilities out of the box. Instead, developers need to manually configure their components and dependencies. In contrast, Spring Boot offers automatic configuration where it can detect and configure beans based on the available classpath and annotations.
Modularity: Hydra Framework follows a modular design approach, allowing developers to build applications by combining different modules based on their requirements. Spring Boot, on the other hand, provides a more monolithic approach where the framework itself includes various modules and dependencies by default.
ORM Support: Hydra Framework provides built-in support for Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) through its HydraORM module. It includes features like entity management, queries, transactions, and caching. In comparison, Spring Boot supports ORM through its Spring Data JPA module, which provides easy integration with various ORM frameworks like Hibernate.
Web Development: Hydra Framework provides a lightweight web development framework called Hydra Web MVC, which focuses on simplicity and performance. It offers features like routing, request handling, and view rendering. In contrast, Spring Boot offers a robust web development framework built on top of Spring MVC, providing advanced features like RESTful APIs, security, and middleware integration.
Community Support: Spring Boot has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-driven forums where developers can seek help and share knowledge. Hydra Framework, being relatively new, has a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.

In summary, Hydra Framework and Spring Boot differ in terms of their ApplicationContext implementation, auto-configuration capabilities, modularity, ORM support, web development frameworks, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring Boot, Hydra Framework

Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceon

Java

Spring Boot

JavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k

Comments

Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

NestJS

Node.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k

Comments

Milan

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring Boot

Node.js

React

Hi, I am looking to select tech stack for front end and back end development. Considering Spring Boot vs Node.js for developing microservices. Front end tech stack is selected as React framework. Both of them are equally good for me, long term perspective most of services will be more based on I/O vs heavy computing. Leaning toward node.js, but will require team to learn this tech stack, so little hesitant.

650k views650k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Boot	Hydra Framework
Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.	A Python framework that simplifies the development of complex applications
-	Hierarchical configuration composable from multiple sources; Configuration can be specified or overridden from the command line; Dynamic command line tab completion; Run your application locally or launch it to run remotely; Run multiple jobs with different arguments with a single command
Statistics
GitHub Stars 78.9K	GitHub Stars 9.9K
GitHub Forks 41.6K	GitHub Forks 723
Stacks 26.7K	Stacks 14
Followers 24.3K	Followers 48
Votes 1.0K	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 149 Powerful and handy 134 Easy setup 128 Java 90 Spring 85 Fast Cons 23 Heavy weight 18 Annotation ceremony 13 Java 11 Many config files needed 5 Reactive	Pros 1 Multirun different jobs with one command 1 Override everything in your config from the command lin 1 Automatic logging configuration 1 Automatic working directory per run 1 Compose your config from the command line
Integrations
Spring Java	Windows Linux Python macOS

What are some alternatives to Spring Boot, Hydra Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Hydra Framework vs Spring Boot: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here we will discuss the key differences between Hydra Framework and Spring Boot.

ApplicationContext: Hydra Framework uses HydraApplicationContext, which is a custom implementation of the ApplicationContext interface, to manage the application's components and provide dependency injection. On the other hand, Spring Boot uses the AnnotationConfigApplicationContext to enable component scanning and automatically configure the application based on annotations.
Auto Configuration: Hydra Framework does not provide auto-configuration capabilities out of the box. Instead, developers need to manually configure their components and dependencies. In contrast, Spring Boot offers automatic configuration where it can detect and configure beans based on the available classpath and annotations.
Modularity: Hydra Framework follows a modular design approach, allowing developers to build applications by combining different modules based on their requirements. Spring Boot, on the other hand, provides a more monolithic approach where the framework itself includes various modules and dependencies by default.
ORM Support: Hydra Framework provides built-in support for Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) through its HydraORM module. It includes features like entity management, queries, transactions, and caching. In comparison, Spring Boot supports ORM through its Spring Data JPA module, which provides easy integration with various ORM frameworks like Hibernate.
Web Development: Hydra Framework provides a lightweight web development framework called Hydra Web MVC, which focuses on simplicity and performance. It offers features like routing, request handling, and view rendering. In contrast, Spring Boot offers a robust web development framework built on top of Spring MVC, providing advanced features like RESTful APIs, security, and middleware integration.
Community Support: Spring Boot has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-driven forums where developers can seek help and share knowledge. Hydra Framework, being relatively new, has a smaller community and fewer resources available for support.

Hydra Framework vs Spring Boot

Overview

Hydra Framework vs Spring Boot: What are the differences?