StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Insomnia REST Client vs Karate DSL

Insomnia REST Client vs Karate DSL

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Insomnia REST Client
Insomnia REST Client
Stacks800
Followers652
Votes44
Karate DSL
Karate DSL
Stacks148
Followers268
Votes85

Insomnia REST Client vs Karate DSL: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Insomnia REST Client and Karate DSL.

1. Authentication Support: Insomnia REST Client provides a user-friendly interface for managing various authentication methods like Basic, OAuth, and JWT, while Karate DSL allows for seamless authentication handling through embedded Java code within test scripts.

2. Graphical User Interface: Insomnia REST Client offers a visually appealing and intuitive GUI for creating and sending HTTP requests, whereas Karate DSL relies on a more code-centric approach with scenarios written in a readable and descriptive syntax using keywords.

3. Request Templating: Insomnia REST Client supports request templating, allowing users to define and reuse variables in requests, while Karate DSL utilizes feature files to define reusable scenarios and corresponding data sets for testing.

4. Asserting Response Data: Insomnia REST Client offers basic response validation capabilities through assertions on response headers and body content, whereas Karate DSL enables more advanced response validation by integrating Java-based assertions within test scripts.

5. Test Scripting Capabilities: Insomnia REST Client lacks built-in scripting capabilities, requiring external tools or plugins for advanced testing scenarios, while Karate DSL provides a powerful scripting environment for executing complex test scenarios without the need for additional tools.

6. Reporting and Integration: Insomnia REST Client supports basic reporting features through exportable logs and scripts but lacks extensive integration options, whereas Karate DSL offers seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines and reporting tools like Jenkins and Cucumber for efficient test automation workflows.

In Summary, Insomnia REST Client excels in simplicity and user-friendly interface, while Karate DSL stands out for its powerful automation capabilities and seamless integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Insomnia REST Client, Karate DSL

Stephen
Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Insomnia REST Client
Insomnia REST Client
Karate DSL
Karate DSL

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Mac, Windows and Linux;Data import/export;SSL client certificates;Response history;JSONPath and XPath;Preview rendered HTML;Multipart form;Query parameter editor;Configurable proxy;Cloud sync and sharing;Nunjucks templating;Filter requests;Toggle SSL validation;Keyboard shortcuts;Configurable timeout;HAR import;Usable at almost all sizes;Drag-n-drop organization;Responsive interface;Import from curl;
Native support for both JSON and XML; Powerful payload assertions with "deep-equals"; Data-driven testing; Easy even for non-programmers; Embedded JavaScript engine; Test-doubles or HTTP mocking built-in; Re-use test scripts as performance-tests; Environment switching; Comprehensive reports, supported by all CI tools
Statistics
Stacks
800
Stacks
148
Followers
652
Followers
268
Votes
44
Votes
85
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Easy to work with
  • 11
    Great user interface
  • 6
    Works with GraphQL
  • 4
    Cross platform, available for Mac, Windows, and Linux
  • 3
    Opensource
Cons
  • 4
    Do not have team sharing options
  • 2
    Do not store credentials in HTTP
Pros
  • 11
    Easy CI integration via cross-platform executable / CLI
  • 9
    Easy for even non-programmers to get started
  • 9
    Simple and meaningful asserts for large responses
  • 7
    Data-driven tests that can even use JSON or CSV sources
  • 5
    Easy parameterized configuration / custom variables
Cons
  • 1
    Complex folder structure, without a defined pattern
  • 1
    Karate uses its own scripting language
  • 1
    There is no IntelliSense support in IDE
  • 1
    Finding errors in code is not easy
  • 1
    Ode support becomes very time consuming and expensive b
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Java
Java
Cucumber
Cucumber
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JUnit
JUnit
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Insomnia REST Client, Karate DSL?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp