Alternatives to Isotope logo

Alternatives to Isotope

Atom, Element, Nuclide, jQuery, and React are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Isotope.
50
21
+ 1
0

What is Isotope and what are its top alternatives?

Isotope is a popular JavaScript library that enables filtering, sorting, and layout modes for dynamic web layouts. Key features include responsive design, customizable layouts, and support for various input types like select menus and checkboxes. However, Isotope has limitations such as limited browser support and the need for manual layout adjustment in some cases.

  1. Masonry: Masonry is a JavaScript grid layout library that focuses on aligning items vertically for a Pinterest-style layout. It offers responsive design, infinite scrolling, and various configuration options. Pro: Easy to use. Con: Limited layout customization.
  2. Gridstack.js: Gridstack.js is a dynamic grid system that allows for responsive grid layouts with draggable and resizable elements. Key features include drag-and-drop support, nested grids, and mobile-friendly designs. Pro: Highly customizable layouts. Con: Steeper learning curve.
  3. Packery: Packery is a JavaScript layout library that enables drag-and-drop grid layouts with intelligent packing algorithms. It supports flexible grid sizes, dynamic layouts, and item ordering. Pro: Efficient packing algorithm. Con: Limited features compared to Isotope.
  4. Salvattore: Salvattore is a lightweight JavaScript library for creating responsive grid layouts with a focus on performance. It offers lazy loading, infinite scrolling, and support for various CSS frameworks. Pro: Lightweight and fast. Con: Limited layout customization options.
  5. Freetile: Freetile is an open-source JavaScript library for creating dynamic grid layouts with an emphasis on minimizing gaps between items. It supports fluid animations, custom sizes, and responsive designs. Pro: Minimized gaps for polished look. Con: Limited browser support.
  6. Shuffle.js: Shuffle.js is a JavaScript library for filtering, sorting, and resizing grid layouts with support for various content types. It offers smooth animations, custom layouts, and lazy loading. Pro: Versatile filtering options. Con: Slightly slower performance.
  7. Muuri: Muuri is a responsive, sortable, and filterable grid layout library that supports drag-and-drop functionality. It includes animation options, layout optimization, and seamless integration with various frameworks. Pro: Robust drag-and-drop features. Con: Advanced customization may require additional effort.
  8. Wookmark: Wookmark is a JavaScript plugin for creating Pinterest-like dynamic grid layouts with options for filtering, sorting, and infinite scrolling. It supports lazy loading, custom animations, and adaptive layouts. Pro: Simple setup and configuration. Con: Lack of advanced features.
  9. Gridifier: Gridifier is a JavaScript library for creating grid layouts with drag-and-drop support and customization options. It offers smart item placement, responsive design, and seamless integration with various frameworks. Pro: Smart grid placement algorithm. Con: Limited documentation.
  10. Freewall: Freewall is a responsive grid layout library that allows for easy customization and control over grid elements. It supports various sizes, infinite scrolling, and lazy loading. Pro: Simple and lightweight. Con: Limited advanced features.

Top Alternatives to Isotope

  • Atom
    Atom

    At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it. ...

  • Element
    Element

    Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources. ...

  • Nuclide
    Nuclide

    A unified developer experience for web and mobile development, built as a suite of packages on top of Atom to provide hackability and the support of an active community. ...

  • jQuery
    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • AngularJS
    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

  • Vue.js
    Vue.js

    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. ...

  • jQuery UI
    jQuery UI

    Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice. ...

Isotope alternatives & related posts

Atom logo

Atom

16.8K
2.5K
A hackable text editor for the 21st Century
16.8K
2.5K
PROS OF ATOM
  • 529
    Free
  • 449
    Open source
  • 343
    Modular design
  • 321
    Hackable
  • 316
    Beautiful UI
  • 147
    Backed by github
  • 119
    Built with node.js
  • 113
    Web native
  • 107
    Community
  • 35
    Packages
  • 18
    Cross platform
  • 5
    Nice UI
  • 5
    Multicursor support
  • 5
    TypeScript editor
  • 3
    Open source, lots of packages, and so configurable
  • 3
    cli start
  • 3
    Simple but powerful
  • 3
    Chrome Inspector works IN EDITOR
  • 3
    Snippets
  • 2
    Code readability
  • 2
    It's powerful
  • 2
    Awesome
  • 2
    Smart TypeScript code completion
  • 2
    Well documented
  • 1
    works with GitLab
  • 1
    "Free", "Hackable", "Open Source", The Awesomness
  • 1
    full support
  • 1
    vim support
  • 1
    Split-Tab Layout
  • 1
    Apm publish minor
  • 1
    Consistent UI on all platforms
  • 1
    User friendly
  • 1
    Hackable and Open Source
  • 0
    Publish
CONS OF ATOM
  • 19
    Slow with large files
  • 7
    Slow startup
  • 2
    Most of the time packages are hard to find.
  • 1
    No longer maintained
  • 1
    Cannot Run code with F5
  • 1
    Can be easily Modified

related Atom posts

Jerome Dalbert
Principal Backend Software Engineer at StackShare · | 13 upvotes · 930.9K views

I liked Sublime Text for its speed, simplicity and keyboard shortcuts which synergize well when working on scripting languages like Ruby and JavaScript. I extended the editor with custom Python scripts that improved keyboard navigability such as autofocusing the sidebar when no files are open, or changing tab closing behavior.

But customization can only get you so far, and there were little things that I still had to use the mouse for, such as scrolling, repositioning lines on the screen, selecting the line number of a failing test stack trace from a separate plugin pane, etc. After 3 years of wearily moving my arm and hand to perform the same repetitive tasks, I decided to switch to Vim for 3 reasons:

  • your fingers literally don’t ever need to leave the keyboard home row (I had to remap the escape key though)
  • it is a reliable tool that has been around for more than 30 years and will still be around for the next 30 years
  • I wanted to "look like a hacker" by doing everything inside my terminal and by becoming a better Unix citizen

The learning curve is very steep and it took me a year to master it, but investing time to be truly comfortable with my #TextEditor was more than worth it. To me, Vim comes close to being the perfect editor and I probably won’t need to switch ever again. It feels good to ignore new editors that come out every few years, like Atom and Visual Studio Code.

See more
Julian Sanchez
Lead Developer at Chore Champion · | 9 upvotes · 783.1K views

We use Visual Studio Code because it allows us to easily and quickly integrate with Git, much like Sublime Merge ,but it is integrated into the IDE. Another cool part about VS Code is the ability collaborate with each other with Visual Studio Live Share which allows our whole team to get more done together. It brings the convenience of the Google Suite to programming, offering something that works more smoothly than anything found on Atom or Sublime Text

See more
Element logo

Element

86
3
A Vue 2.0-based desktop UI library for developers, designers and PMs
86
3
PROS OF ELEMENT
  • 3
    Very complete solution
CONS OF ELEMENT
  • 2
    Buggy in parts

related Element posts

Nuclide logo

Nuclide

35
40
An open IDE for web and native mobile development, built on top of Atom (by Facebook)
35
40
PROS OF NUCLIDE
  • 8
    Remote development with SSH
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 4
    Very Fast
  • 4
    Built By Facebook
  • 4
    Autocomplete
  • 4
    Web and mobile development
  • 2
    Free
  • 2
    Smart auto-completion
  • 2
    Can do anything Atom can
  • 1
    Git integration
  • 1
    Support for Flow
  • 1
    VIM integration
CONS OF NUCLIDE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Nuclide posts

    jQuery logo

    jQuery

    192K
    6.6K
    The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
    192K
    6.6K
    PROS OF JQUERY
    • 1.3K
      Cross-browser
    • 957
      Dom manipulation
    • 809
      Power
    • 660
      Open source
    • 610
      Plugins
    • 459
      Easy
    • 395
      Popular
    • 350
      Feature-rich
    • 281
      Html5
    • 227
      Light weight
    • 93
      Simple
    • 84
      Great community
    • 79
      CSS3 Compliant
    • 69
      Mobile friendly
    • 67
      Fast
    • 43
      Intuitive
    • 42
      Swiss Army knife for webdev
    • 35
      Huge Community
    • 11
      Easy to learn
    • 4
      Clean code
    • 3
      Because of Ajax request :)
    • 2
      Powerful
    • 2
      Nice
    • 2
      Just awesome
    • 2
      Used everywhere
    • 1
      Improves productivity
    • 1
      Javascript
    • 1
      Easy Setup
    • 1
      Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
    • 1
      It Just Works
    • 1
      Industry acceptance
    • 1
      Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
    • 1
      Widely Used
    • 1
      I love jQuery
    CONS OF JQUERY
    • 6
      Large size
    • 5
      Sometimes inconsistent API
    • 5
      Encourages DOM as primary data source
    • 2
      Live events is overly complex feature

    related jQuery posts

    Kir Shatrov
    Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 22 upvotes · 2.4M views

    The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

    Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

    #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

    See more
    Ganesa Vijayakumar
    Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.5M views

    I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

    I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

    As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

    UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

    Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

    Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

    Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

    Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

    Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

    Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

    Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

    Thanks, Ganesa

    See more
    React logo

    React

    173.3K
    4.1K
    A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
    173.3K
    4.1K
    PROS OF REACT
    • 832
      Components
    • 673
      Virtual dom
    • 578
      Performance
    • 508
      Simplicity
    • 442
      Composable
    • 186
      Data flow
    • 166
      Declarative
    • 128
      Isn't an mvc framework
    • 120
      Reactive updates
    • 115
      Explicit app state
    • 50
      JSX
    • 29
      Learn once, write everywhere
    • 22
      Easy to Use
    • 21
      Uni-directional data flow
    • 17
      Works great with Flux Architecture
    • 11
      Great perfomance
    • 10
      Javascript
    • 9
      Built by Facebook
    • 8
      TypeScript support
    • 6
      Server Side Rendering
    • 6
      Speed
    • 5
      Feels like the 90s
    • 5
      Excellent Documentation
    • 5
      Props
    • 5
      Functional
    • 5
      Easy as Lego
    • 5
      Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
    • 5
      Cross-platform
    • 5
      Easy to start
    • 5
      Hooks
    • 5
      Awesome
    • 5
      Scalable
    • 4
      Super easy
    • 4
      Allows creating single page applications
    • 4
      Server side views
    • 4
      Sdfsdfsdf
    • 4
      Start simple
    • 4
      Strong Community
    • 4
      Fancy third party tools
    • 4
      Scales super well
    • 3
      Has arrow functions
    • 3
      Beautiful and Neat Component Management
    • 3
      Just the View of MVC
    • 3
      Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
    • 3
      Fast evolving
    • 3
      SSR
    • 3
      Great migration pathway for older systems
    • 3
      Rich ecosystem
    • 3
      Simple
    • 3
      Has functional components
    • 3
      Every decision architecture wise makes sense
    • 3
      Very gentle learning curve
    • 2
      Split your UI into components with one true state
    • 2
      Image upload
    • 2
      Permissively-licensed
    • 2
      Fragments
    • 2
      Sharable
    • 2
      Recharts
    • 2
      HTML-like
    • 1
      React hooks
    • 1
      Datatables
    CONS OF REACT
    • 41
      Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
    • 30
      No predefined way to structure your app
    • 29
      Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
    • 13
      JSX
    • 10
      Not enterprise friendly
    • 6
      One-way binding only
    • 3
      State consistency with backend neglected
    • 3
      Bad Documentation
    • 2
      Error boundary is needed
    • 2
      Paradigms change too fast

    related React posts

    Johnny Bell

    I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

    I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

    I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

    Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

    Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

    With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

    If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

    See more
    Collins Ogbuzuru
    Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 38 upvotes · 267.2K views

    Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

    React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

    ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

    Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

    I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

    See more
    AngularJS logo

    AngularJS

    61K
    5.3K
    Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
    61K
    5.3K
    PROS OF ANGULARJS
    • 889
      Quick to develop
    • 589
      Great mvc
    • 573
      Powerful
    • 520
      Restful
    • 505
      Backed by google
    • 349
      Two-way data binding
    • 343
      Javascript
    • 329
      Open source
    • 307
      Dependency injection
    • 197
      Readable
    • 75
      Fast
    • 65
      Directives
    • 63
      Great community
    • 57
      Free
    • 38
      Extend html vocabulary
    • 29
      Components
    • 26
      Easy to test
    • 25
      Easy to learn
    • 24
      Easy to templates
    • 23
      Great documentation
    • 21
      Easy to start
    • 19
      Awesome
    • 18
      Light weight
    • 15
      Angular 2.0
    • 14
      Efficient
    • 14
      Javascript mvw framework
    • 14
      Great extensions
    • 11
      Easy to prototype with
    • 9
      High performance
    • 9
      Coffeescript
    • 8
      Two-way binding
    • 8
      Lots of community modules
    • 8
      Mvc
    • 7
      Easy to e2e
    • 7
      Clean and keeps code readable
    • 6
      One of the best frameworks
    • 6
      Easy for small applications
    • 5
      Works great with jquery
    • 5
      Fast development
    • 4
      I do not touch DOM
    • 4
      The two-way Data Binding is awesome
    • 3
      Hierarchical Data Structure
    • 3
      Be a developer, not a plumber.
    • 3
      Declarative programming
    • 3
      Typescript
    • 3
      Dart
    • 3
      Community
    • 2
      Fkin awesome
    • 2
      Opinionated in the right areas
    • 2
      Supports api , easy development
    • 2
      Common Place
    • 2
      Very very useful and fast framework for development
    • 2
      Linear learning curve
    • 2
      Great
    • 2
      Amazing community support
    • 2
      Readable code
    • 2
      Programming fun again
    • 2
      The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
    • 2
      Scopes
    • 2
      Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest
    • 1
      Fk react, all my homies hate react
    CONS OF ANGULARJS
    • 12
      Complex
    • 3
      Event Listener Overload
    • 3
      Dependency injection
    • 2
      Hard to learn
    • 2
      Learning Curve

    related AngularJS posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

    Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

    • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
    • npm as package manager
    • NestJS as Node.js framework
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • ExpressJS as web server
    • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
    • Postman as a tool for API development
    • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
    • JSON Web Token for access token management

    The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

    • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
    • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
    • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
    • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
    See more
    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 4.9M views

    Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

    • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
    • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
    • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
    • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
    • Jest as testing framework
    • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
    • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

    The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

    • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
    • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
    • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
    • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
    • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
    • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
    See more
    Vue.js logo

    Vue.js

    54.3K
    1.6K
    A progressive framework for building user interfaces
    54.3K
    1.6K
    PROS OF VUE.JS
    • 294
      Simple and easy to start with
    • 230
      Good documentation
    • 196
      Components
    • 131
      Simple the best
    • 100
      Simplified AngularJS
    • 95
      Reactive
    • 78
      Intuitive APIs
    • 56
      Javascript
    • 52
      Changed my front end coding life
    • 48
      Configuration is smooth
    • 38
      Easy to learn
    • 36
      So much fun to use
    • 26
      Progressive
    • 22
      Virtual dom
    • 16
      Faster than bulldogs on hot tarmac
    • 12
      It's magic
    • 12
      Component is template, javascript and style in one
    • 10
      Light Weight
    • 10
      Perfomance
    • 9
      Best of Both Worlds
    • 8
      Application structure
    • 8
      Elegant design
    • 8
      Intuitive and easy to use
    • 8
      Without misleading licenses
    • 6
      Small learning curve
    • 6
      Good command line interface
    • 5
      Logicless templates
    • 5
      Single file components
    • 5
      Easy to integrate to HTML by inline-templates
    • 5
      Like Angular only quicker to get started with
    • 4
      High performance
    • 3
      Component based
    • 3
      Vuex
    • 3
      Bridge from Web Development to JS Development
    • 3
      Customer Render ending eg to HTML
    • 2
      Lots of documentation
    • 2
      Concise error messages
    • 2
      Supports several template languages
    • 2
      One-way data flow
    • 2
      Intuitive
    • 1
      GUI
    CONS OF VUE.JS
    • 9
      Less Common Place
    • 5
      YXMLvsHTML Markup
    • 3
      Don't support fragments
    • 3
      Only support programatically multiple root nodes

    related Vue.js posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

    Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

    • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
    • npm as package manager
    • NestJS as Node.js framework
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • ExpressJS as web server
    • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
    • Postman as a tool for API development
    • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
    • JSON Web Token for access token management

    The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

    • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
    • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
    • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
    • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
    See more
    Johnny Bell
    Shared insights
    on
    Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

    I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

    It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

    See more
    jQuery UI logo

    jQuery UI

    40.4K
    899
    Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library
    40.4K
    899
    PROS OF JQUERY UI
    • 215
      Ui components
    • 156
      Cross-browser
    • 121
      Easy
    • 100
      It's jquery
    • 81
      Open source
    • 57
      Widgets
    • 48
      Plugins
    • 46
      Popular
    • 39
      Datepicker
    • 23
      Great community
    • 7
      DOM Manipulation
    • 6
      Themes
    • 0
      Some good ui components
    CONS OF JQUERY UI
    • 1
      Does not contain charts or graphs

    related jQuery UI posts

    Ganesa Vijayakumar
    Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.5M views

    I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

    I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

    As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

    UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

    Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

    Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

    Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

    Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

    Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

    Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

    Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

    Thanks, Ganesa

    See more
    Khauth György
    CTO at SalesAutopilot Kft. · | 12 upvotes · 573K views

    I'm the CTO of a marketing automation SaaS. Because of the continuously increasing load we moved to the AWSCloud. We are using more and more features of AWS: Amazon CloudWatch, Amazon SNS, Amazon CloudFront, Amazon Route 53 and so on.

    Our main Database is MySQL but for the hundreds of GB document data we use MongoDB more and more. We started to use Redis for cache and other time sensitive operations.

    On the front-end we use jQuery UI + Smarty but now we refactor our app to use Vue.js with Vuetify. Because our app is relatively complex we need to use vuex as well.

    On the development side we use GitHub as our main repo, Docker for local and server environment and Jenkins and AWS CodePipeline for Continuous Integration.

    See more