Tilt vs k3s

Overview

Tilt

Stacks29

Followers64

Votes0

k3s

Stacks97

Followers252

Votes16

Tilt vs k3s: What are the differences?

Installation Complexity: One key difference between Tilt and k3s is the installation complexity. Tilt is comparatively easier to install and set up as it requires minimal configuration and dependencies, making it more beginner-friendly. On the other hand, k3s, being a lightweight Kubernetes distribution, may involve more complex installation steps due to specific requirements and a more extensive feature set.
Resource Consumption: In terms of resource consumption, Tilt is designed to be more lightweight and efficient, consuming fewer resources compared to k3s. This makes Tilt a suitable choice for development environments where resource constraints may be a concern. On the other hand, k3s, although lightweight for a Kubernetes distribution, may consume more resources due to its additional features and functionalities.
Scope of Functionality: Another significant difference between Tilt and k3s lies in the scope of functionality they offer. Tilt is primarily focused on improving the developer experience by streamlining the development workflow, providing features like live updates and visualization tools. In contrast, k3s is a full-fledged Kubernetes distribution with a broader range of features, making it suitable for production environments requiring advanced Kubernetes capabilities.
Managed Environments: Tilt is more tailored towards local development environments, providing tools and features specifically for developers working on their individual machines or within small teams. On the other hand, k3s is designed to be scalable and suitable for managed environments like production clusters, enabling seamless deployment and management of containerized applications at scale.
Community Support: When it comes to community support, k3s, being a widely adopted Kubernetes distribution with a larger user base, typically offers more extensive community support, resources, and documentation. Tilt, while actively developed and supported, may have a smaller community presence and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and development assistance.
Customization Options: Tilt offers a higher level of customization options tailored towards enhancing the developer experience and workflow, allowing users to personalize their setup based on specific requirements and preferences. In contrast, k3s, being a more standardized Kubernetes distribution, may have limitations in terms of customization, especially in areas that deviate from its established configurations and best practices.

In Summary, Tilt focuses on developer-friendly features with minimal resource consumption, while k3s offers a more comprehensive Kubernetes distribution with scalability and community support advantages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tilt	k3s
Tilt makes it possible to develop all your microservices locally in Kubernetes while collaborating with your team.	Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.
-	ARM64 and ARMv7 support; Simplified installation; SQLite3 support; etcd support; Automatic Manifest and Helm Chart management; containerd, CoreDNS, Flannel support
Statistics
Stacks 29	Stacks 97
Followers 64	Followers 252
Votes 0	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 6 Lightweight 4 Easy 2 Scale Services 2 Open Source 2 Replication Controller
Integrations
Docker Kubernetes	Kubernetes SQLite

What are some alternatives to Tilt, k3s?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Tilt vs k3s: What are the differences?

Installation Complexity: One key difference between Tilt and k3s is the installation complexity. Tilt is comparatively easier to install and set up as it requires minimal configuration and dependencies, making it more beginner-friendly. On the other hand, k3s, being a lightweight Kubernetes distribution, may involve more complex installation steps due to specific requirements and a more extensive feature set.
Resource Consumption: In terms of resource consumption, Tilt is designed to be more lightweight and efficient, consuming fewer resources compared to k3s. This makes Tilt a suitable choice for development environments where resource constraints may be a concern. On the other hand, k3s, although lightweight for a Kubernetes distribution, may consume more resources due to its additional features and functionalities.
Scope of Functionality: Another significant difference between Tilt and k3s lies in the scope of functionality they offer. Tilt is primarily focused on improving the developer experience by streamlining the development workflow, providing features like live updates and visualization tools. In contrast, k3s is a full-fledged Kubernetes distribution with a broader range of features, making it suitable for production environments requiring advanced Kubernetes capabilities.
Managed Environments: Tilt is more tailored towards local development environments, providing tools and features specifically for developers working on their individual machines or within small teams. On the other hand, k3s is designed to be scalable and suitable for managed environments like production clusters, enabling seamless deployment and management of containerized applications at scale.
Community Support: When it comes to community support, k3s, being a widely adopted Kubernetes distribution with a larger user base, typically offers more extensive community support, resources, and documentation. Tilt, while actively developed and supported, may have a smaller community presence and fewer resources available for troubleshooting and development assistance.
Customization Options: Tilt offers a higher level of customization options tailored towards enhancing the developer experience and workflow, allowing users to personalize their setup based on specific requirements and preferences. In contrast, k3s, being a more standardized Kubernetes distribution, may have limitations in terms of customization, especially in areas that deviate from its established configurations and best practices.

Tilt vs k3s

Overview