StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Kind vs Portainer

Kind vs Portainer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Portainer
Portainer
Stacks506
Followers842
Votes146
Kind
Kind
Stacks26
Followers59
Votes0
GitHub Stars14.7K
Forks1.7K

Kind vs Portainer: What are the differences?

Introduction: 
Key differences between Kind and Portainer are highlighted below.

1. **Architecture**: Kind is a tool designed for running local Kubernetes clusters using Docker container "nodes," whereas Portainer is a user-friendly management tool for Docker environments with a web-based interface.
2. **Focus**: Kind specifically targets Kubernetes and provides a way to run clusters quickly for testing and development purposes, while Portainer caters more towards managing Docker containers, images, and networks with an emphasis on ease of use.
3. **Scalability**: Kind is primarily intended for creating lightweight, single-node clusters for testing purposes and may not scale well for production environments, whereas Portainer can be used to manage larger-scale Docker deployments across multiple nodes.
4. **Community Support**: Kind is an open-source project maintained by the Kubernetes community, ensuring regular updates and support from the community, while Portainer also has a vibrant community but is developed by a commercial entity, providing professional support options.
5. **User Interface**: Portainer offers a visually appealing web interface with features like container logs, resource usage monitoring, and management of Docker Swarm Clusters, enhancing the user experience compared to Kind's more minimalistic command-line interface.
6. **Advanced Features**: Portainer includes advanced features such as user authentication, role-based access control, and multi-host management capabilities, making it a more comprehensive solution for managing containerized environments compared to Kind.

In Summary, the key differences between Kind and Portainer lie in their architecture, focus, scalability, community support, user interface, and advanced features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Portainer
Portainer
Kind
Kind

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

It is a tool for running local Kubernetes clusters using Docker container “nodes”. It was primarily designed for testing Kubernetes itself, but may be used for local development or CI.

Docker management; Docker UI; Docker cluster management; Swarm visualizer; Authentication; User Access Control; Docker container management; Docker service management; Docker overview; Docker console; Docker swarm status; Docker image management; Docker network management; Docker dashboard; Remote HTTP API; Automation
Supports multi-node (including HA) clusters; Supports building Kubernetes release builds from source; Support for make / bash / docker, or bazel, in addition to pre-published builds; Supports Linux, macOS and Windows; It is a CNCF certified conformant Kubernetes installer
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
14.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
506
Stacks
26
Followers
842
Followers
59
Votes
146
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 36
    Simple
  • 27
    Great UI
  • 19
    Friendly
  • 12
    Easy to setup, gives a practical interface for Docker
  • 11
    Because it just works, super simple yet powerful
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Docker Secrets
Docker Secrets
Auth0
Auth0
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Bazel
Bazel

What are some alternatives to Portainer, Kind?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana