StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. KNIME vs StreamSets

KNIME vs StreamSets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

StreamSets
StreamSets
Stacks53
Followers133
Votes0
KNIME
KNIME
Stacks53
Followers46
Votes0

KNIME vs StreamSets: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between KNIME and StreamSets:

1. **Data Integration Approach**: KNIME focuses on visual programming, allowing users to create data integration workflows using a drag-and-drop interface. In contrast, StreamSets emphasizes on pipeline-based data integration, enabling users to design dataflows by configuring pipelines.
2. **Connectivity to Data Sources**: KNIME provides a wide range of connectors and extensions to connect to various data sources such as databases, APIs, and big data platforms. StreamSets offers a diverse set of data connectors and origins specifically optimized for real-time data ingestion and processing.
3. **Real-time Data Processing**: StreamSets is renowned for its capability to handle real-time data processing with efficiency and low latency. On the other hand, KNIME is more suitable for batch processing and data analytics tasks that don't require real-time responses.
4. **Ease of Use for Beginners**: KNIME is considered user-friendly, especially for beginners, due to its intuitive interface and comprehensive documentation. StreamSets, although powerful, may have a steeper learning curve for novice users due to its focus on complex data pipeline configurations.
5. **Community and Support**: KNIME has a large and active community of users and developers, which contributes to a vast repository of pre-built workflows and components. StreamSets also has a supportive community, but its resources may not be as extensive as KNIME's community-driven ecosystem.
6. **Scalability and Performance**: StreamSets is often preferred for its scalability and high performance in handling large volumes of data rapidly. KNIME, while capable of scaling to some extent, may face limitations in terms of performance when dealing with massive data sets.

In Summary, KNIME and StreamSets differ in their data integration approach, connectivity to data sources, real-time data processing capabilities, ease of use for beginners, community support, and scalability/performance strengths. Each platform has its own strengths and is suited for different use cases based on these key differences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

StreamSets
StreamSets
KNIME
KNIME

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

It is a free and open-source data analytics, reporting and integration platform. KNIME integrates various components for machine learning and data mining through its modular data pipelining concept.

Only StreamSets provides a single design experience for all design patterns (batch, streaming, CDC, ETL, ELT, and ML pipelines) for 10x greater developer productivity; smart data pipelines that are resilient to change for 80% less breakages; and a single pane of glass for managing and monitoring all pipelines across hybrid and cloud architectures to eliminate blind spots and control gaps.
Access, merge, and transform all of your data; Make sense of your data with the tools you choose; Support enterprise-wide data science practices; Leverage insights gained from your data
Statistics
Stacks
53
Stacks
53
Followers
133
Followers
46
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 2
    No user community
  • 1
    Crashes
No community feedback yet
Integrations
HBase
HBase
Databricks
Databricks
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
gRPC
gRPC
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis
Python
Python
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
R Language
R Language
TensorFlow
TensorFlow
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Keras
Keras
H2O
H2O

What are some alternatives to StreamSets, KNIME?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase