Kobiton vs Wallaby.js

Overview

Wallaby.js

Stacks10

Followers18

Votes0

Kobiton

Stacks25

Followers66

Votes0

Kobiton vs Wallaby.js: What are the differences?

Supported Platforms: Kobiton supports a wide range of mobile devices, including iOS and Android, allowing users to test their applications on real devices. On the other hand, Wallaby.js is specifically designed for JavaScript testing and works with popular testing frameworks such as Jasmine, Mocha, and Jest.
Testing Capabilities: Kobiton offers both manual and automated testing capabilities, allowing users to execute test scripts, perform exploratory testing, and access real devices remotely. In contrast, Wallaby.js focuses on providing real-time feedback during development, highlighting test results, code coverage, and performance metrics.
Integration with Development Workflow: Kobiton integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools, issue tracking systems, and test automation frameworks to streamline the testing process within the development workflow. Wallaby.js integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio Code, WebStorm, and Atom to provide immediate feedback on test results while coding.
Cost Structure: Kobiton operates on a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the number of users, devices, and parallel test executions required. On the other hand, Wallaby.js offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of developers using the tool and the level of support required.

In Summary, Kobiton and Wallaby.js cater to different aspects of the software development lifecycle, with Kobiton focusing on mobile testing across a wide range of devices and Wallaby.js specializing in continuous testing for JavaScript development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Wallaby.js	Kobiton
It is an intelligent test runner for JavaScript that continuously runs your tests. It reports code coverage and other results directly to your code editor immediately as you change your code.	It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.
Continuous Testing and TDD/BDD for JavaScript, CoffeeScript and TypeScript, Webpack, Browserify, ES6, ES7, node.js, Jest	Automated or manual tests on real devices; Rich test logs; Public, Private or Hybrid cloud support; Support for all major CI/CD tools and processes
Statistics
Stacks 10	Stacks 25
Followers 18	Followers 66
Votes 0	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Cons 1 Limited minutes
Integrations
QUnit Jest Jasmine Mocha	CircleCI Travis CI Jenkins TeamCity

What are some alternatives to Wallaby.js, Kobiton?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Appium

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Related Comparisons

Kobiton vs Wallaby.js: What are the differences?

Supported Platforms: Kobiton supports a wide range of mobile devices, including iOS and Android, allowing users to test their applications on real devices. On the other hand, Wallaby.js is specifically designed for JavaScript testing and works with popular testing frameworks such as Jasmine, Mocha, and Jest.
Testing Capabilities: Kobiton offers both manual and automated testing capabilities, allowing users to execute test scripts, perform exploratory testing, and access real devices remotely. In contrast, Wallaby.js focuses on providing real-time feedback during development, highlighting test results, code coverage, and performance metrics.
Integration with Development Workflow: Kobiton integrates seamlessly with popular CI/CD tools, issue tracking systems, and test automation frameworks to streamline the testing process within the development workflow. Wallaby.js integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio Code, WebStorm, and Atom to provide immediate feedback on test results while coding.
Cost Structure: Kobiton operates on a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the number of users, devices, and parallel test executions required. On the other hand, Wallaby.js offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of developers using the tool and the level of support required.

Kobiton vs Wallaby.js

Overview