StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Kubenav vs Lens

Kubenav vs Lens

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kubenav
Kubenav
Stacks2
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.2K
Forks141
Lens
Lens
Stacks151
Followers183
Votes9
GitHub Stars23.0K
Forks1.5K

Kubenav vs Lens: What are the differences?

Introduction

Kubenav and Lens are two popular tools used for managing and monitoring Kubernetes clusters. While both serve the same purpose, they have key differences that set them apart.

  1. User Interface: Kubenav provides a simple and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to navigate and perform cluster management tasks. On the other hand, Lens offers a more feature-rich and comprehensive UI, with advanced functionalities that allow users to dig deep into their clusters and view detailed information.

  2. Multi-cluster Support: Kubenav focuses on managing a single Kubernetes cluster, making it suitable for small-scale deployments or situations where managing multiple clusters is not a requirement. In contrast, Lens specializes in managing multiple clusters, providing a unified interface to seamlessly switch between different Kubernetes clusters and manage them efficiently.

  3. Plugins and Extensions: One key difference between Kubenav and Lens is the availability of plugins and extensions. Kubenav has limited support for plugins, offering basic functionalities for cluster management and monitoring. In contrast, Lens provides extensive support for plugins and extensions, enabling users to customize and enhance their experience by adding additional features and integrations.

  4. Community Support and Development: Lens benefits from a vibrant and active open-source community, with ongoing development and regular updates. This ensures that Lens remains up-to-date with the latest Kubernetes features and improvements. Kubenav, while also being open source, has a relatively smaller community and slower development pace, which may result in delayed updates and limited new feature releases.

  5. Operating System Compatibility: Kubenav is primarily designed for mobile devices and provides native applications for both iOS and Android platforms. This makes it a convenient choice for users who prefer managing their Kubernetes clusters on the go. Lens, on the other hand, is a desktop application available for Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems, offering more flexibility in terms of the devices and platforms it can be utilized on.

  6. Advanced Monitoring and Insights: While both Kubenav and Lens offer cluster monitoring capabilities, Lens provides more advanced monitoring and insights features. It offers built-in Grafana integration, allowing users to visualize metrics and create custom dashboards. Lens also provides more detailed and extensive cluster metrics, giving users deeper insights into the performance and health of their clusters.

In summary, Kubenav is a lightweight and user-friendly tool suitable for managing a single Kubernetes cluster, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. On the other hand, Lens is a feature-rich and powerful tool designed to handle multiple clusters, with advanced functionalities and extensive monitoring capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Kubenav
Kubenav
Lens
Lens

It is the navigator for your Kubernetes clusters right in your pocket. It is a mobile and desktop app to help you manage Kubernetes clusters and stay up to date on whats going on in your clusters.

It is the only IDE you’ll ever need to take control of your Kubernetes clusters. It is a standalone application for MacOS, Windows and Linux operating systems. It is open source and free.

Available for mobile and desktop; Manage workloads like Deployments, Pods and StatefulSets in your Kubernetes cluster; Get an overview of other resources like Services, ConfigMaps, Persistent Volumes, Secrets and Role Bindings; CRD support; Manage multiple clusters
Multi Cluster Management; Multiple Workspaces; Built-In Prometheus Stats; Built-in Helm Applications Management; Context Aware Terminal;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.2K
GitHub Stars
23.0K
GitHub Forks
141
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
2
Stacks
151
Followers
7
Followers
183
Votes
0
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Keep track of cluster changes
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 2
    Easy management of multiple clusters
  • 1
    Local installation, not SaaS
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to Kubenav, Lens?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana