StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Lens vs minikube

Lens vs minikube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

minikube
minikube
Stacks110
Followers262
Votes3
GitHub Stars31.1K
Forks5.1K
Lens
Lens
Stacks151
Followers183
Votes9
GitHub Stars23.0K
Forks1.5K

Lens vs minikube: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of Kubernetes, there are various tools and platforms available for managing and orchestrating Kubernetes clusters. Two popular choices are Lens and minikube. Although they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them.

  1. Installation and Setup: Lens is a desktop application that needs to be installed directly on a machine, regardless of the operating system. On the other hand, minikube is a lightweight tool that runs a single-node Kubernetes cluster locally and can be easily set up via command-line tools.

  2. User Interface: Lens provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that allows users to visualize and manage their Kubernetes clusters, applications, and resources. It offers an intuitive dashboard, logs viewer, and a built-in terminal for executing commands. In contrast, minikube primarily operates through the command line interface (CLI), requiring users to run various commands to interact with the local Kubernetes cluster.

  3. Cluster Management: Lens supports managing multiple Kubernetes clusters from a single interface. It allows users to conveniently switch between different clusters and view their respective resources and configurations. On the other hand, minikube is primarily focused on providing a local development environment with a single Kubernetes cluster.

  4. Additional Features: Lens offers additional features such as integrated terminal for running shell commands, built-in support for Helm charts, and the ability to easily view and manage Kubernetes cluster and application settings. Minikube, however, focuses on providing a minimal and lightweight environment to run a Kubernetes cluster locally, without including many additional features.

  5. Compatibility and Resources: Lens is designed to work with any Kubernetes cluster, whether it is hosted in the cloud or locally. It provides a rich set of features that are compatible with various Kubernetes versions and configurations. Minikube, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for local development and testing purposes, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use.

  6. Community and Support: Lens has a growing community of users and contributors, with active development and regular updates. It provides extensive documentation and support channels to assist users in case of any issues or queries. Minikube, being an open-source project backed by Kubernetes, also has a strong community and offers active support through various channels.

In summary, Lens is a powerful desktop application with a graphical user interface that enables managing and visualizing multiple Kubernetes clusters, while minikube provides a lightweight and simple local development environment for running a single Kubernetes cluster.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

minikube
minikube
Lens
Lens

It implements a local Kubernetes cluster on macOS, Linux, and Windows. Its goal is to be the tool for local Kubernetes application development and to support all Kubernetes features that fit.

It is the only IDE you’ll ever need to take control of your Kubernetes clusters. It is a standalone application for MacOS, Windows and Linux operating systems. It is open source and free.

Local Kubernetes; LoadBalancer; Multi-cluster
Multi Cluster Management; Multiple Workspaces; Built-In Prometheus Stats; Built-in Helm Applications Management; Context Aware Terminal;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.1K
GitHub Stars
23.0K
GitHub Forks
5.1K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
110
Stacks
151
Followers
262
Followers
183
Votes
3
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Let's me test k8s config locally
  • 1
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Can use same yaml config I'll use for prod deployment
Pros
  • 4
    Keep track of cluster changes
  • 2
    Easy management of multiple clusters
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 1
    Local installation, not SaaS
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to minikube, Lens?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana