MailHog vs Mailinator

Overview

Mailinator

Stacks12

Followers26

Votes1

MailHog

Stacks44

Followers63

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.7K

Forks472

MailHog vs Mailinator: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to email testing and management, MailHog and Mailinator are two popular tools with distinct differences.

Purpose: MailHog is primarily used for testing email functionality in development environments by creating a fake SMTP server to capture and display email messages. On the other hand, Mailinator is a public disposable email service that allows users to receive emails on randomly generated email addresses for temporary use.
Privacy: MailHog provides a more secure option for email testing as it keeps all test emails local to the development environment. In contrast, Mailinator's disposable email addresses are public and can be accessed by anyone, potentially compromising the privacy of the received emails.
Usage Limitations: MailHog is typically used for local email testing within a development environment and may not be ideal for receiving emails from external sources. Conversely, Mailinator is designed for temporary email use and is not suitable for long-term email management or storage.
Customization Options: MailHog offers various customization options for configuring SMTP settings, email handling, and UI appearance to suit specific testing needs. In contrast, Mailinator provides limited customization features as its primary focus is on disposable email functionality.
Paid Services: Mailinator offers paid subscription plans with additional features such as private domains, increased storage, and team collaboration tools. In contrast, MailHog is an open-source tool that is free to use without any paid services or premium features included.
Email Retention: MailHog retains emails locally within the development environment for a limited period before they are automatically deleted. Mailinator, however, retains emails on its servers for a configurable period, allowing users to access and manage past email messages for a longer duration.

In Summary, MailHog is tailored for local email testing with customization options, while Mailinator is a public disposable email service with limited privacy and customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mailinator	MailHog
Mailinator is a disposable email service that allows QA departments to test with 1000's of inboxes.	It is an email testing tool for developers. You can configure your application to use MailHog for SMTP delivery. You can view messages in the web UI, or retrieve them with the JSON API.
email testing; email; email receipt testing	ESMTP server implementing RFC5321; Support for SMTP AUTH (RFC4954) and PIPELINING (RFC2920); Web interface to view messages (plain text, HTML or source)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 6.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 472
Stacks 12	Stacks 44
Followers 26	Followers 63
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 E-mail simply testing	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	HTML5 MongoDB Laravel

What are some alternatives to Mailinator, MailHog?

Litmus

Litmus is a testing service for web and marketing professionals. It allows people to cross-browser test their websites, and test their email newsletters across a range of email clients and spam filters.

Email on Acid

Email on Acid is the most affordable, self-serve email testing platform in the world. We can help you maximize the success of your email marketing efforts by diagnosing and improving your renderability, deliverability, click-throughs and conversions.

Mailtrap

We offer one platform that covers all email-related needs in one place: testing, sending, and in-depth tracking to control how email infrastructure works and performs.

Mailsac

Disposable email and fake email capture for QA and development teams

MTN Email Verifier

MTN Email Verifier is a high-performance tool for ensuring that your email communications reach the right inboxes every time. With the rise of email marketing and automated outreach, maintaining a clean list of deliverable email addresses is crucial. MTN Email Verifier combines syntax validation, domain checks, and server-level SMTP verification to deliver a reliable, real-time solution.

Premailer

For the best HTML e-mail delivery results, CSS should be inline. This is a huge pain and a simple newsletter becomes un-managable very quickly. This script is the solution.

MailCatcher

It runs a super simple SMTP server which catches any message sent to it to display in a web interface. It catches all mail and stores it for display. It shows HTML, Plain Text and Source version of messages, as applicable.

Mailosaur

Automate email and SMS tests, like account verification and password resets, using any language or testing framework using the Mailosaur API. Stop email being delivered to customers using fake SMTP servers.

MailSlurp

MailSlurp is an end-to-end email testing service. It has a web-app for managing your account and a REST API for sending and receiving emails from randomly generated email addresses.

testmail.app

It automates end-to-end email tests with a powerful GraphQL API and unlimited private email addresses and inboxes, test new user signups, transactional emails, drip campaigns, deliverability, spam scores, etc.

Related Comparisons

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack

MailHog vs Mailinator: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to email testing and management, MailHog and Mailinator are two popular tools with distinct differences.

Purpose: MailHog is primarily used for testing email functionality in development environments by creating a fake SMTP server to capture and display email messages. On the other hand, Mailinator is a public disposable email service that allows users to receive emails on randomly generated email addresses for temporary use.
Privacy: MailHog provides a more secure option for email testing as it keeps all test emails local to the development environment. In contrast, Mailinator's disposable email addresses are public and can be accessed by anyone, potentially compromising the privacy of the received emails.
Usage Limitations: MailHog is typically used for local email testing within a development environment and may not be ideal for receiving emails from external sources. Conversely, Mailinator is designed for temporary email use and is not suitable for long-term email management or storage.
Customization Options: MailHog offers various customization options for configuring SMTP settings, email handling, and UI appearance to suit specific testing needs. In contrast, Mailinator provides limited customization features as its primary focus is on disposable email functionality.
Paid Services: Mailinator offers paid subscription plans with additional features such as private domains, increased storage, and team collaboration tools. In contrast, MailHog is an open-source tool that is free to use without any paid services or premium features included.
Email Retention: MailHog retains emails locally within the development environment for a limited period before they are automatically deleted. Mailinator, however, retains emails on its servers for a configurable period, allowing users to access and manage past email messages for a longer duration.

In Summary, MailHog is tailored for local email testing with customization options, while Mailinator is a public disposable email service with limited privacy and customization capabilities.