Overview

RocketChat

Stacks367

Followers542

Votes324

GitHub Stars43.8K

Forks12.4K

Microsoft Teams

Stacks2.4K

Followers1.7K

Votes144

Microsoft Teams vs RocketChat: What are the differences?

Introduction

Microsoft Teams and RocketChat are both popular communication and collaboration tools used by teams and organizations. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of features, functionality, and integrations.

Integration with Microsoft ecosystem: The main advantage of Microsoft Teams is its seamless integration with other Microsoft tools and services such as Office 365, SharePoint, and Outlook. This allows users to access and collaborate on files, documents, and appointments directly within the Teams platform. On the other hand, RocketChat offers a wide range of integrations with various third-party services, making it a flexible option for teams using different software tools.
License and cost: Microsoft Teams is available as part of the Office 365 suite, with different plans and pricing options depending on the organization's needs. RocketChat, on the other hand, is an open-source platform that can be downloaded and installed for free, making it a more cost-effective solution for smaller teams or organizations on a tight budget.
Customization and extensibility: RocketChat provides a highly customizable and extensible platform with access to the source code, allowing teams to modify and tailor the software to their specific requirements. Microsoft Teams, while offering some customization options, has more limited extensibility compared to RocketChat.
User interface and user experience: Microsoft Teams has a sleek and user-friendly interface, with an emphasis on simplicity and intuitive navigation. It offers a polished user experience, especially for users already familiar with the Microsoft Office suite. RocketChat, on the other hand, has a slightly less refined user interface but offers a more flexible layout and customization options for individuals who prefer a more personalized experience.
Video conferencing and calling features: Both Microsoft Teams and RocketChat offer video conferencing and calling capabilities, but Microsoft Teams has the advantage of natively integrating with other Microsoft tools such as Skype for Business. This integration provides a more seamless and familiar experience for users already using Skype.
Security and compliance: Microsoft Teams has robust security measures in place, including data encryption, multi-factor authentication, and compliance with industry standards such as ISO 27001 and HIPAA. RocketChat also offers security features like two-factor authentication, GDPR compliance, and end-to-end encryption but may require additional configuration and customization depending on the deployment environment.

In summary, Microsoft Teams stands out for its tight integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, user-friendly interface, and video conferencing capabilities, while RocketChat offers more customization options, cost-effectiveness, and a wide range of integrations with third-party services. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms depends on the specific needs and preferences of the team or organization.

🔥 Trending in Messaging on StackShare

Slack Messaging

Bring all your communication together in one place

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

97.7k

Advice on RocketChat, Microsoft Teams

carlche0616

Oct 11, 2020

Decided

As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.

197k views197k

Comments

Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k

Comments

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planallay Sdn Bhd

Jan 17, 2020

Decided

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

266k views266k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

RocketChat	Microsoft Teams
Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.	See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.
BYOS (bring your own server);Multiple Rooms;Direct Messages;Private Groups;Public Channels;Desktop Notifications;Mentions;Avatars;Markdown;Emojis;Transcripts / History;I18n - Internationalization	All your content, tools, people, and conversations are available in the team workspace;Enjoy built-in access to SharePoint, OneNote, and Skype for Business;Work on documents right in the app
Statistics
GitHub Stars 43.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 12.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 367	Stacks 2.4K
Followers 542	Followers 1.7K
Votes 324	Votes 144
Pros & Cons
Pros 72 Open source 38 Can be deployed on premise 32 Byos (bring your own server) 30 Faster than Slack 21 Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch Cons 1 Limited message history on SaaS 1 Few options for user customization 1 No screen recorder 1 Visioconference support is external 1 Many basic features require plugins	Pros 29 Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow 24 Mobile friendly 19 Free 12 Great integrations 12 Well-thought Design Cons 17 Confusing UI 12 Bad performance on init and after quite a use 10 Bad Usermanagement 6 No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app) 6 Can't see all members in a video meeting
Integrations
Confluence GitHub Amazon S3 GitLab Prometheus Jira Amazon SNS GitHub Enterprise Hubot Docker Cloud	Skype

What are some alternatives to RocketChat, Microsoft Teams?

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Let's Chat

Let's Chat is a persistent messaging application that runs on Node.js and MongoDB. It's designed to be easily deployable and fits well with small, intimate teams. It's free (MIT licensed) and ships with killer features such as LDAP/Kerberos authentication, a REST-like API and XMPP support.