StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Localhost Tools
  5. Packetriot vs ngrok

Packetriot vs ngrok

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ngrok
ngrok
Stacks419
Followers457
Votes57
GitHub Stars24.4K
Forks4.3K
Packetriot
Packetriot
Stacks3
Followers14
Votes0

Packetriot vs ngrok: What are the differences?

Introduction

Packetriot and ngrok are both tools that help facilitate secure and reliable access to local servers or applications from the internet. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Pricing model: Packetriot offers a simple and transparent pricing model based on the number of devices and the amount of bandwidth used. On the other hand, ngrok provides a more complex pricing structure based on the number of concurrent connections and connections per minute, which can make it less predictable for budgeting purposes.

  2. Deployment options: Packetriot offers self-hosted deployment options, allowing users to have more control over their infrastructure and data. Ngrok, on the other hand, is a cloud-based solution, which means users rely on ngrok's infrastructure for their tunneling needs.

  3. Support for static IP addresses: Packetriot supports the use of static IP addresses, allowing users to have a fixed public IP address for their tunnels, which can be useful for whitelisting or integration purposes. Ngrok, however, does not provide this feature and relies on dynamic IP addresses assigned by their service.

  4. Custom domain support: Packetriot allows users to map their tunnels to custom domains, providing a more professional and branded experience when sharing or accessing their applications. Ngrok, on the other hand, does not offer this capability, limiting users to ngrok-specific subdomains for accessing their tunnels.

  5. Authentication mechanisms: Packetriot offers various authentication mechanisms, including token-based authentication and integration with OAuth providers, allowing users to add an extra layer of security to their tunnels. Ngrok, on the other hand, only provides HTTP basic authentication for protecting tunnels, which may be considered less secure in certain scenarios.

  6. Additional features: Packetriot provides additional features such as the ability to route traffic to specific ports or hosts, making it more flexible for complex network configurations. Ngrok, on the other hand, lacks these advanced routing capabilities, making it more suitable for simpler use cases.

In summary, Packetriot offers a simpler pricing model, self-hosted deployment options, support for static IP addresses and custom domains, more authentication mechanisms, and additional features like advanced routing. Ngrok, on the other hand, provides a cloud-based solution with a more complex pricing structure, limited authentication options, and lacks some of the advanced routing capabilities provided by Packetriot.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ngrok
ngrok
Packetriot
Packetriot

ngrok is a reverse proxy that creates a secure tunnel between from a public endpoint to a locally running web service. ngrok captures and analyzes all traffic over the tunnel for later inspection and replay.

It uses a secure reverse tunneling protocol to expose servers on local or private networks to the Internet. It supports HTTP/S and TCP traffic and is built to work behind Firewalls, NATs, and Carrier Grade NATs (CG-NAT). Tunnels are assigned a unique and persistent hostname and connect to the same Packetriot server making it simple to setup custom domains. Integration with Let's Encrypt makes it automatic and simple to secure services. The Packetriot client can serve both upstream web services and static assets eliminating additional tools, such as web servers, and reduce configuration overhead for testing.

Expose any http service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a subdomain of ngrok.com;Expose any tcp service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a random port of ngrok.com;Inspect all http requests/responses that are transmitted over the tunnel;Replay any request that was transmitted over the tunnel
Expose any number of HTTP/S services on any network to the Internet; Expose any number of HTTP/S services on any network to the Internet using custom domains; TCP port allocation and relaying; Password protection for upstream services;Custom domain ownership verification;Automatic TLS certificate management via Let's Encrypt;Custom TLS certificates;Transparent TLS proxying;Upstream and static asset file-serving removing need additional web servers;IP Firewall fitlering;Official Docker container image;Stable public URL endpoint;Persistent traffic rule management and 24/7 operation;Systemd services scripts;Packages for Debian and RPM;Support for Linux, Mac, Windows and OpenBSD
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
419
Stacks
3
Followers
457
Followers
14
Votes
57
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Easy to use
  • 11
    Super-fast
  • 7
    Free
  • 6
    Awesome traffic analysis page
  • 5
    Reliable custom domains
Cons
  • 5
    Doesn't Support UDP
  • 1
    El tunel SSH cambia de dominio constantemente
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Let's Encrypt
Let's Encrypt

What are some alternatives to ngrok, Packetriot?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

GitLab Pages

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Firebase Hosting

Firebase Hosting

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

Termius

Termius

The #1 cross-platform terminal with built-in ssh client which works as your own portable server management system in any situation.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana