StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. ORY Kratos vs Spring Security

ORY Kratos vs Spring Security

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks559
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos
Stacks14
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.5K
Forks1.1K

ORY Kratos vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this comparison, we will discuss the key differences between ORY Kratos and Spring Security. ORY Kratos is an open-source user management and user authentication system, while Spring Security is a widely-used framework for securing Java applications. We will explore their differences in terms of architecture, features, ease of use, community support, extensibility, and compatibility with different programming languages.

  1. Architecture: ORY Kratos follows a microservice architecture, where the functionalities are divided into separate services that can be independently scaled. On the other hand, Spring Security is integrated into the Spring ecosystem and follows a monolithic architecture, where all the security features are available within the Spring application context.

  2. Features: ORY Kratos offers a comprehensive set of features for user management and authentication, including password hashing, user registration, multi-factor authentication, account recovery, and social sign-in. Spring Security also provides a wide range of features, including authentication, authorization, session management, method-level security, and integration with external identity providers.

  3. Ease of Use: ORY Kratos offers a user-friendly and intuitive user interface for managing user identities and authentication. It provides a ready-to-use authentication and account management system that can be easily integrated into applications. Spring Security, on the other hand, requires more manual configuration and coding to implement authentication and authorization features.

  4. Community Support: ORY Kratos is a relatively new project but has been gaining popularity among developers. It has an active community that provides support through forums, GitHub issues, and documentation. Spring Security, being a mature and widely adopted framework, has a larger community with extensive resources, tutorials, and third-party plugins available for solving common security challenges.

  5. Extensibility: ORY Kratos offers a pluggable architecture that allows developers to extend and customize the system according to their specific requirements. It provides various extension points, such as custom authentication methods and identity providers. Spring Security, being highly modular, also offers extensibility through custom authentication providers, access decision voters, and filters.

  6. Compatibility: ORY Kratos is primarily designed for use with the Go programming language, although it provides REST and gRPC APIs that can be utilized by applications written in other programming languages too. On the other hand, Spring Security is a Java-based framework that integrates well with Spring applications written in Java.

In Summary, ORY Kratos and Spring Security differ in terms of their architecture, features, ease of use, community support, extensibility, and programming language compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring Security, ORY Kratos

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Security
Spring Security
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

It is a cloud native user management system. It provides user login and registration, multi-factor authentication, and user information storage with a headless API. It is fully configurable and supports a wide range of protocols such as Google Authenticator, and stores user information using JSON Schema.

Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
Self-service Login and Registration; Multi-Factor Authentication; Account Verification; Account Recovery; Profile and Account Management
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Stars
12.5K
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
559
Stacks
14
Followers
589
Followers
99
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Java integration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
Java
Java
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Spring Security, ORY Kratos?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope