StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. ORY Kratos vs Stormpath

ORY Kratos vs Stormpath

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Stormpath
Stormpath
Stacks40
Followers96
Votes146
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos
Stacks14
Followers99
Votes0
GitHub Stars12.5K
Forks1.1K

ORY Kratos vs Stormpath: What are the differences?

Introduction

ORY Kratos and Stormpath are both identity management solutions, but they have key differences that set them apart. Below are some of the main differences between ORY Kratos and Stormpath:

  1. Open Source vs. Closed Source: ORY Kratos is an open-source identity management solution, allowing users to view and modify its source code. In contrast, Stormpath is a closed-source platform, restricting access to its source code. This difference gives ORY Kratos users more flexibility and control over their identity management system.

  2. Community Support vs. Dedicated Support: ORY Kratos relies on community support, with users contributing to its development and troubleshooting. On the other hand, Stormpath provides dedicated support from its team, offering more personalized assistance to users. This difference can impact the level of assistance and customization available to users of each platform.

  3. Customization Options: ORY Kratos offers extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the identity management system to their specific needs. In comparison, Stormpath may have more limited customization options due to its closed-source nature. This difference can affect the ability to adapt the system to unique business requirements.

  4. Integration with Other Tools: ORY Kratos emphasizes compatibility and integration with various third-party tools and services, providing a wider range of options for users. Stormpath may have a more limited selection of integrations due to being a closed-source platform. This difference can influence the ease of incorporating identity management into existing systems.

  5. Pricing Model: ORY Kratos follows an open-source model, typically offering its basic features for free with potential costs for additional services or support. Stormpath, as a closed-source platform, may have a fixed pricing structure for access to its features and support. This difference in pricing models can impact the overall cost of implementing an identity management solution.

  6. Scalability and Performance: ORY Kratos is designed for scalability and high performance, allowing it to handle large volumes of user data and authentication requests efficiently. Stormpath may have more limited scalability capabilities due to its closed-source nature and potentially fixed infrastructure. This difference can affect the ability to accommodate growing user bases and increased system demands.

In Summary, ORY Kratos and Stormpath differ in their approach to openness, support, customization, integrations, pricing, and scalability, impacting the level of control, assistance, flexibility, compatibility, cost, and performance available to users of each platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Stormpath
Stormpath
ORY Kratos
ORY Kratos

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

It is a cloud native user management system. It provides user login and registration, multi-factor authentication, and user information storage with a headless API. It is fully configurable and supports a wide range of protocols such as Google Authenticator, and stores user information using JSON Schema.

User Authentication as a Service; Authorization – Easily model and manage your data, including pre-built roles; Flexible User Profiles; Single Sign-On Across your Apps; Easy Partitioning for Multi-Tenant SaaS; Pre-built Security Workflows - Password Reset, Email Verification; Hosted Login Portal; Social Login; API Authentication & Key Management; Token-based Authentication; Multi-Factor Authentication; Active Directory & LDAP Integrations; Advanced Password Security; Admin Console; Safe Harbor Compliance; HIPAA Compliance; Private Deployments;
Self-service Login and Registration; Multi-Factor Authentication; Account Verification; Account Recovery; Profile and Account Management
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
40
Stacks
14
Followers
96
Followers
99
Votes
146
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Authentication
  • 22
    User Management
  • 19
    API Authentication
  • 17
    Token Authentication
  • 17
    Security Workflows
Cons
  • 4
    Discontinued
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
G Suite
G Suite
Spring Framework
Spring Framework
Facebook
Facebook
Spring
Spring
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
AngularJS
AngularJS
JavaScript
JavaScript
Django
Django
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
Java
Java
PHP
PHP
Ruby
Ruby
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Stormpath, ORY Kratos?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope