StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. PA Server Monitor vs Zabbix

PA Server Monitor vs Zabbix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PA Server Monitor
PA Server Monitor
Stacks2
Followers4
Votes0
Zabbix
Zabbix
Stacks684
Followers981
Votes66
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.1K

PA Server Monitor vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

  1. Installation and Ease of Use: PA Server Monitor offers a user-friendly interface and easy installation process compared to Zabbix. With PA Server Monitor, users can quickly set up monitoring tasks without extensive configuration, making it more convenient for users with limited technical expertise.
  2. Scalability: Zabbix is known for its scalability, supporting larger infrastructures and networks compared to PA Server Monitor. Zabbix can efficiently monitor thousands of devices, making it a suitable choice for enterprises with complex and extensive IT environments that require comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
  3. Monitoring Templates: PA Server Monitor provides predefined monitoring templates for various devices and applications, simplifying the setup process for users. In contrast, Zabbix requires users to create custom templates from scratch, which can be time-consuming, especially for users with specific monitoring requirements.
  4. Alerting Mechanisms: Zabbix offers a robust alerting system that allows for flexible alert configurations based on various criteria like severity and time intervals. In comparison, PA Server Monitor's alerting system may be more simplistic, catering to users who prefer a straightforward approach to notifications and alerts.
  5. Support and Community: Zabbix has a large and active community of users and developers, providing extensive support resources, forums, and plugins. PA Server Monitor, on the other hand, may have a smaller user base, resulting in limited community support and resources available for users seeking assistance or troubleshooting guidance.
  6. Cost: PA Server Monitor typically offers a more affordable pricing structure compared to Zabbix, making it a cost-effective choice for small to medium-sized businesses or organizations with budget constraints. Zabbix, on the other hand, may entail higher licensing costs, especially for larger deployments requiring advanced features and support services.

In Summary, PA Server Monitor and Zabbix differ in terms of installation ease, scalability, monitoring templates, alerting mechanisms, support resources, and cost considerations, catering to various user preferences and requirements in the realm of IT monitoring.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PA Server Monitor, Zabbix

vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PA Server Monitor
PA Server Monitor
Zabbix
Zabbix

It is a server monitoring and network monitoring software application. The main function of the software is to monitor performance of servers and network devices in Windows and Linux environments. Data is kept on customers servers, not stored in the cloud.

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

PA Server Monitor can watch: Event logs on local & remote Windows servers; Ping response times; CPU & memory usage; Free local & server disk space; Changed files & directories for intrusion detection; Running Windows services; NIC usage; Performance counter values with threshold warnings; POP, IMAP & SMTP mail server availability status; Web page content & load times; Server temperature; Monitor servers across the Internet without a VPN with our Satellite monitoring engine; File age; FTP server; Inventory data; Log files; Processes; SNMP and SNMP Traps; Syslog; TCP Port; Other Features include Smart Config; Easy install; Mobile apps; External API; Runs as a service; Automated maintenance schedule; Automatic failover; Bulk configuration; Configuration security; Database options; Embedded HTTP server; Error auditing; Event escalation.
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
2
Stacks
684
Followers
4
Followers
981
Votes
0
Votes
66
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 21
    Free
  • 9
    Alerts
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 5
    Templates
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
Cons
  • 5
    The UI is in PHP
  • 2
    Puppet module is sluggish
Integrations
No integrations available
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
Ansible
Ansible
Skype
Skype
Chef
Chef
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
HipChat
HipChat
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com

What are some alternatives to PA Server Monitor, Zabbix?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana