StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Pants vs Sonatype Nexus

Pants vs Sonatype Nexus

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pants
Pants
Stacks23
Followers86
Votes30
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks674
Sonatype Nexus
Sonatype Nexus
Stacks526
Followers370
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks672

Pants vs Sonatype Nexus: What are the differences?

  1. Installation and Configuration: Pants is a build system that focuses on fast and reproducible builds, while Sonatype Nexus is a repository manager that stores artifacts. Pants requires installation and configuration on the local machine to build projects, while Sonatype Nexus is set up on a server to manage and store artifacts centrally.
  2. Build Process: Pants uses a file system monitor to detect changes in source files and incrementally rebuilds only the necessary parts, resulting in faster build times. On the other hand, Sonatype Nexus does not have a build process but serves as a centralized repository for storing and managing artifacts produced by build tools.
  3. Dependency Management: Pants relies on the BUILD files for specifying dependencies and building targets within a project. In contrast, Sonatype Nexus manages dependencies by proxying external repositories and caching artifacts for faster access.
  4. Integration with Build Tools: Pants is integrated with various build tools and languages like Java, Python, and Scala, allowing developers to build projects in different languages using a single tool. Sonatype Nexus is not a build tool but integrates with popular build tools like Maven and Gradle to pull dependencies from repositories during the build process.
  5. Artifact Management: Pants does not manage artifacts but focuses on the build process and dependency resolution within a project. Sonatype Nexus, on the other hand, excels in artifact management by providing features like version control, access control, and repository formats to efficiently store and distribute artifacts.
  6. Community and Support: Pants has a smaller community compared to Sonatype Nexus, which is widely used in enterprise environments and supported by Sonatype, offering professional support and enterprise features for large-scale artifact management.

In Summary, Pants focuses on fast and reproducible builds with integrated dependency management, while Sonatype Nexus excels in repository and artifact management with extensive support and features for enterprise environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pants
Pants
Sonatype Nexus
Sonatype Nexus

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

Builds Java, Scala, and Python.;Adding support for new languages is straightforward.;Supports code generation: thrift, protocol buffers, custom code generators.;Resolves external JVM and Python dependencies.;Runs tests.;Spawns Python and Scala REPLs with appropriate load paths.;Creates deployable packages.;Scales to large repos with many interdependent modules.;Designed for incremental builds.;Support for local and distributed caching.;Especially fast for Scala builds, compared to alternatives.;Builds standalone python executables (PEX files);Has a plugin system to add custom features and override stock behavior.;Runs on Linux and Mac OS X.
Supports ZIP;System information;Metrices;Logging and Log viewer
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
674
GitHub Forks
672
Stacks
23
Stacks
526
Followers
86
Followers
370
Votes
30
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Creates deployable packages
  • 4
    Runs on Linux
  • 4
    Runs on OS X
  • 4
    BUILD files
  • 4
    Runs tests
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
PHP
PHP
.NET
.NET
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to Pants, Sonatype Nexus?

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Apache Ant

Apache Ant

Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.

Please

Please

Please is a cross-language build system with an emphasis on high performance, extensibility and reproduceability. It supports a number of popular languages and can automate nearly any aspect of your build process.

CMake

CMake

It is used to control the software compilation process using simple platform and compiler independent configuration files, and generate native makefiles and workspaces that can be used in the compiler environment of the user's choice.

JFrog Artifactory

JFrog Artifactory

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana