Alternatives to Phaser logo

Alternatives to Phaser

Vibe, CreateJS, Pixi, Godot, and Unity are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Phaser.
119
143
+ 1
0

What is Phaser and what are its top alternatives?

It is a free open source HTML5 game framework. It uses Pixi.js for WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Games can be compiled to iOS and Android apps via 3rd party tools.
Phaser is a tool in the Game Development category of a tech stack.
Phaser is an open source tool with 31.8K GitHub stars and 6.7K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Phaser's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Phaser

  • Vibe
    Vibe

    Vibe is an easy to use people research tool. You can use Vibe to find the person behind any email address. After installing the Vibe Chrome, Mac, iPhone or Outlook app, with a simple hover or click on any email address, you can find all information about the person in less than 3 seconds. ...

  • CreateJS
    CreateJS

    It is a suite of modular libraries and tools which work together or independently to enable rich interactive content on open web technologies via HTML5. These libraries are interoperable with all modern desktop and mobile browsers, and have been thoroughly tested to achieve performance and reliability in the widest range of browsers possible. ...

  • Pixi
    Pixi

    Super fast HTML 5 2D rendering engine that uses webGL with canvas fallback

  • Godot
    Godot

    It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world. ...

  • Unity
    Unity

    Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers. ...

  • three.js
    three.js

    It is a cross-browser JavaScript library and Application Programming Interface used to create and display animated 3D computer graphics in a web browser. ...

  • Unreal Engine
    Unreal Engine

    It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game. ...

  • pygame
    pygame

    It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language. ...

Phaser alternatives & related posts

Vibe logo

Vibe

5
5
2
Hover your mouse over any E-mail ID, get the full information about the person behind that address
5
5
+ 1
2
PROS OF VIBE
  • 1
    Great replacement for Rapportive
  • 1
    Hover over email addresses anywhere
CONS OF VIBE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Vibe posts

    CreateJS logo

    CreateJS

    12
    35
    0
    A javascript suite of open source libraries and tools
    12
    35
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF CREATEJS
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF CREATEJS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related CreateJS posts

        Pixi logo

        Pixi

        63
        76
        6
        Create beautiful digital content with the fastest, most flexible 2D WebGL renderer
        63
        76
        + 1
        6
        PROS OF PIXI
        • 6
          Fast Performance
        CONS OF PIXI
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Pixi posts

          Godot logo

          Godot

          152
          184
          29
          Free and open source 2D and 3D game engine
          152
          184
          + 1
          29
          PROS OF GODOT
          • 8
            Open source
          • 5
            Easy to port
          • 3
            Avaible on Steam For Free
          • 3
            Cross-Platform
          • 3
            Supports both C++, C# and GDScript
          • 3
            Simple
          • 2
            Very Popular in Reddit
          • 2
            GDScript is Based On Python
          CONS OF GODOT
          • 1
            Performance in 3D
          • 1
            Need opengl 2.1 / 3.3
          • 1
            Somewhat poor 3D performance and lacks automatic LODs

          related Godot posts

          Unity logo

          Unity

          1.3K
          1.1K
          60
          Unity brings state-of-the-art, affordable multiplatform tools and services to developers of interactive content everywhere.
          1.3K
          1.1K
          + 1
          60
          PROS OF UNITY
          • 14
            Because it's a powerful engine, you can build anything
          • 12
            C# language
          • 9
            Very Popular
          • 5
            Cross Platform
          • 5
            Easy to Use
          • 5
            He Has A Free VErsion
          • 4
            2nd Game Engine In The World
          • 3
            Good Choise
          • 3
            Very Large Showcase
          CONS OF UNITY
          • 4
            Clunky UI
          • 4
            Closed source
          • 3
            Hard to get started with
          • 3
            No consistency with updates
          • 3
            Requires to build a lot of tools
          • 2
            Gigantic by being 9gb (thats what setup says)

          related Unity posts

          Shared insights
          on
          BabylonJSBabylonJSthree.jsthree.jsUnityUnity

          We already have an existing 3d interactive application for windows, mac, and iOS devices and have planned to move that app to the web for high availability to different types of users. I have been searching for different options for it. Our existing application is made in Unity so we prefer to work on unity webgl but it also has its drawbacks. Other than that we are also thinking to change the tech stack to three.js or BabylonJS due to their high compatibility with the web ecosystem. I want to know which engine/library/framework we should use for the development of our 3d web application. Also with unity webgl, we want to develop all UI parts in web technologies only and will use the unity3d for 3d part only.

          Points that are very important to consider - 1. Memory optimization and allocation 2. Quality 3. Shaders 4. Materials 5. Lighting 6. Mesh editing, mesh creation at runtime 7. Ar 8. Vr 10. Support on different browsers including mobile browsers 11. Physics(gravity, collision, cloth simulation, etc.) 12. Initial load time 13. Speed and performance 14. Max vertices count. What happens when we load models exceeding max vertex count? 15. Development time 16. Learning curve (Unity3d we already working on) 17. Ease of use. What artists can do using any platform eg. in unity3d, artists can edit materials, set up lighting etc? 18. Future scope 19. Scalability 20. Integration with web ecosystem

          See more
          three.js logo

          three.js

          484
          372
          0
          A JavaScript 3D library
          484
          372
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF THREE.JS
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF THREE.JS
              Be the first to leave a con

              related three.js posts

              Shared insights
              on
              BabylonJSBabylonJSthree.jsthree.jsUnityUnity

              We already have an existing 3d interactive application for windows, mac, and iOS devices and have planned to move that app to the web for high availability to different types of users. I have been searching for different options for it. Our existing application is made in Unity so we prefer to work on unity webgl but it also has its drawbacks. Other than that we are also thinking to change the tech stack to three.js or BabylonJS due to their high compatibility with the web ecosystem. I want to know which engine/library/framework we should use for the development of our 3d web application. Also with unity webgl, we want to develop all UI parts in web technologies only and will use the unity3d for 3d part only.

              Points that are very important to consider - 1. Memory optimization and allocation 2. Quality 3. Shaders 4. Materials 5. Lighting 6. Mesh editing, mesh creation at runtime 7. Ar 8. Vr 10. Support on different browsers including mobile browsers 11. Physics(gravity, collision, cloth simulation, etc.) 12. Initial load time 13. Speed and performance 14. Max vertices count. What happens when we load models exceeding max vertex count? 15. Development time 16. Learning curve (Unity3d we already working on) 17. Ease of use. What artists can do using any platform eg. in unity3d, artists can edit materials, set up lighting etc? 18. Future scope 19. Scalability 20. Integration with web ecosystem

              See more
              Shared insights
              on
              WebGLWebGLthree.jsthree.js

              I want a advice on what to use as a beginner three.js or WebGL?

              See more
              Unreal Engine logo

              Unreal Engine

              256
              257
              29
              A suite of integrated tools for game developers
              256
              257
              + 1
              29
              PROS OF UNREAL ENGINE
              • 7
                C++
              • 5
                Blueprints
              • 5
                PBR
              • 4
                Suitable for any projects
              • 4
                Source Available
              • 3
                Convenient and modern UI
              • 1
                Most Popular Game engine
              CONS OF UNREAL ENGINE
              • 6
                Heavy
              • 1
                A lot of "heaviness" myths around

              related Unreal Engine posts

              pygame logo

              pygame

              69
              126
              4
              Open Source python programming language library for making multimedia applications
              69
              126
              + 1
              4
              PROS OF PYGAME
              • 2
                Easy to install
              • 1
                Simple
              • 1
                Lightweigt by only being 12 mb
              CONS OF PYGAME
              • 2
                Has only 2d
              • 1
                Slow

              related pygame posts