StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Polymer vs Quasar Framework

Polymer vs Quasar Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Polymer
Polymer
Stacks557
Followers463
Votes122
GitHub Stars22.1K
Forks2.0K
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework
Stacks451
Followers771
Votes404
GitHub Stars26.9K
Forks3.7K

Polymer vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Polymer and Quasar Framework, focusing on their key differences.

  1. Language: Polymer is a JavaScript library that uses web components to build reusable components, while Quasar Framework is built on top of Vue.js, a progressive JavaScript framework.
  2. Component Library: Polymer has its own set of built-in components, which are highly customizable and provide a wide range of functionalities. On the other hand, Quasar Framework offers a comprehensive set of pre-built components that follow Material Design guidelines.
  3. Bundler: Polymer relies on external tools like Webpack or Rollup to bundle the application, allowing developers to choose the bundler that best fits their needs. In contrast, Quasar Framework comes with its own bundler, making the setup process simpler and more streamlined.
  4. Platform-Specific Support: Polymer focuses mainly on creating web applications that work across different browsers and devices. Quasar Framework, on the other hand, provides additional support for building native mobile applications using Cordova or Electron.
  5. Documentation and Community: Polymer has extensive documentation, which includes guides, references, and examples. It also has an active online community that provides support and shares insights. Quasar Framework also has comprehensive documentation and a thriving community, but being built on top of Vue.js gives it access to an even larger community and ecosystem.
  6. Size of the Bundle: Polymer applications tend to have smaller bundle sizes compared to Quasar Framework applications. This is because Polymer uses web components, which have a smaller footprint, while Quasar Framework includes additional dependencies and components, resulting in a larger bundle size.

In summary, Polymer is a JavaScript library that focuses on building reusable components with web components, while Quasar Framework is a Vue.js-based framework that offers a comprehensive set of pre-built components and provides support for building native mobile applications. Polymer relies on external tools for bundling, while Quasar Framework has its own built-in bundler. Polymer has smaller bundle sizes due to the use of web components, while Quasar Framework includes additional dependencies and components, resulting in larger bundles.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Polymer, Quasar Framework

Gericke
Gericke

Jul 27, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET CoreJavaScriptJavaScriptReactReact

Hi,

I am looking into solutions for reusable components for an existing #MVC project which is build on .NET Core. Currently some functionality is being reuses via JavaScript. I have React experience so I know I can create React components and then reference it on the MVC app. The only problem is I do not know the full extent of it as the current app uses a lot of 3rd party libraries, not sure how that will effect React components. I am currently looking into WebComponents which is also another way for creating reusable components and it is compatible with any JavaScript library based on what I have seen on the website. Also to take in consideration that it should cause a re-write of the system.

So my question is, to future-proof reusable components, which will be best React or Web Components? And which will be more reliable to use with 3rd party libraries?

49.1k views49.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Polymer
Polymer
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework

Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

-
SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.1K
GitHub Stars
26.9K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
3.7K
Stacks
557
Stacks
451
Followers
463
Followers
771
Votes
122
Votes
404
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 52
    Web components
  • 30
    Material design
  • 14
    HTML
  • 13
    Components
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Last version is like 2 years ago? that's totally rad
Pros
  • 59
    Excellent documentation
  • 44
    Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more
  • 40
    Lots of UI components
  • 39
    Extensive collection of components
  • 33
    Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome
Cons
  • 4
    Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
Electron
Electron
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Vue.js
Vue.js
Material Design
Material Design

What are some alternatives to Polymer, Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase