Pusher vs Supabase

Overview

Pusher

Stacks618

Followers1.4K

Votes234

Supabase

Stacks529

Followers455

Votes29

GitHub Stars91.8K

Forks10.5K

Pusher vs Supabase: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Pusher and Supabase are both real-time data streaming platforms, but they have some key differences that set them apart. In this comparison, we will discuss six major differences between Pusher and Supabase.

Pricing Model: Pusher offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of connections and features, with a free plan available. On the other hand, Supabase follows an open-source pricing model, where the core features are free to use, and additional paid features can be added as per the requirement.
Hosted vs Self-hosted: Pusher is a hosted service, meaning that all the infrastructure is managed by Pusher. On the contrary, Supabase provides a self-hosted option, allowing you to host the platform on your own infrastructure. This gives users more control over their data and security.
Database Integration: Pusher primarily focuses on real-time data streaming and doesn't provide built-in database integration. In contrast, Supabase offers seamless integration with PostgreSQL, a powerful open-source relational database. This allows developers to store and query their data directly within Supabase.
Authentication: While both Pusher and Supabase offer authentication capabilities, Supabase provides a more comprehensive solution. Supabase supports a variety of authentication providers like Google, GitHub, and Apple, allowing users to easily implement secure user authentication flows.
Real-time Querying: Pusher offers real-time data streaming but doesn't have built-in support for real-time querying. On the other hand, Supabase offers real-time querying capabilities on top of its PostgreSQL integration. This enables developers to listen for changes in the database and receive live data updates in real time.
Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) vs Open-source: Pusher is a Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) platform, providing developers with a pre-built real-time infrastructure. Supabase, on the other hand, is an open-source project that allows developers to host their own real-time data platform. This gives developers greater flexibility and control over their infrastructure.

In summary, while both Pusher and Supabase offer real-time data streaming capabilities, Supabase stands out with its open-source pricing model, self-hosted option, database integration, comprehensive authentication, real-time querying, and flexibility as an open-source project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pusher	Supabase
Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.	Supabase is currently in early-Alpha .It is an open-source Firebase alternative. It adds realtime and RESTful APIs to your PostgreSQL database without a single line of code.
Easily build scalable in-app notifications, chat, realtime graphs, geotracking and more in your web & mobile apps with our hosted pub/sub messaging API.;Send programmable push notifications to iOS and Android devices with delivery and open rate tracking built in.;Easily add 1-1 and group Chat to your web & mobile apps. Presence, message storage, rich media, notifications, typing indicators and more.;Embed a realtime collaborative editor in your app in seconds to empower your users to do more, together.	Full Postgres database; Instant RESTful API; Realtime notifications via websockets; APIs always in sync with your schema; Custom API docs for your schema; Built-in security & monitoring
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 91.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 10.5K
Stacks 618	Stacks 529
Followers 1.4K	Followers 455
Votes 234	Votes 29
Pros & Cons
Pros 55 An easy way to give customers realtime features 40 Websockets 34 Simple 27 Easy to get started with 25 Free plan Cons 11 Costly	Pros 7 Relational Database 6 Self hosting 3 Free 3 Open source 3 Postgres hosting Cons 0 No cons
Integrations
Slack Datadog Librato	Streamlit CodeSandbox PostgreSQL Arengu Stream PostgREST Replibyte Directus Trevor.io Prisma

What are some alternatives to Pusher, Supabase?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Pusher vs Supabase: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Pricing Model: Pusher offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of connections and features, with a free plan available. On the other hand, Supabase follows an open-source pricing model, where the core features are free to use, and additional paid features can be added as per the requirement.
Hosted vs Self-hosted: Pusher is a hosted service, meaning that all the infrastructure is managed by Pusher. On the contrary, Supabase provides a self-hosted option, allowing you to host the platform on your own infrastructure. This gives users more control over their data and security.
Database Integration: Pusher primarily focuses on real-time data streaming and doesn't provide built-in database integration. In contrast, Supabase offers seamless integration with PostgreSQL, a powerful open-source relational database. This allows developers to store and query their data directly within Supabase.
Authentication: While both Pusher and Supabase offer authentication capabilities, Supabase provides a more comprehensive solution. Supabase supports a variety of authentication providers like Google, GitHub, and Apple, allowing users to easily implement secure user authentication flows.
Real-time Querying: Pusher offers real-time data streaming but doesn't have built-in support for real-time querying. On the other hand, Supabase offers real-time querying capabilities on top of its PostgreSQL integration. This enables developers to listen for changes in the database and receive live data updates in real time.
Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) vs Open-source: Pusher is a Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) platform, providing developers with a pre-built real-time infrastructure. Supabase, on the other hand, is an open-source project that allows developers to host their own real-time data platform. This gives developers greater flexibility and control over their infrastructure.

Pusher vs Supabase

Overview