Rainforest QA vs Selenium

Overview

Rainforest QA

Stacks37

Followers68

Votes53

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

Rainforest QA vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Rainforest QA vs Selenium

Introduction:

In this article, we will compare Rainforest QA and Selenium, two popular tools used for web testing. Both tools have their own set of features and advantages, which makes them suitable for different testing scenarios.

Test Environment: Rainforest QA is a cloud-based testing platform that provides a distributed network of human testers to execute tests across various environments, browsers, and devices. On the other hand, Selenium is an open-source automation framework that allows developers to write and execute tests using various programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, etc. Rainforest QA offers a ready-made testing environment with a team of testers available, while Selenium requires a dedicated setup and development skills.
Test Execution: Rainforest QA relies on human testers who follow predefined test cases and provide feedback, making it suitable for exploratory testing and scenarios that require human judgment. Selenium, on the other hand, uses automation scripts to execute tests, enabling faster and repetitive test execution without human intervention. Selenium is more suitable for regression testing and continuous integration workflows.
Maintenance: Rainforest QA takes care of maintaining its test environment, including managing the pool of testers, test cases, and test execution infrastructure. This relieves the burden of setup and maintenance from the users. Selenium, being an open-source tool, requires users to manage their own test environments, including managing test scripts, browser compatibility, and infrastructure setup.
Scalability: Rainforest QA offers the advantage of scalable testing by providing on-demand access to a large pool of human testers. This makes it easy to scale up or down based on the testing requirements. Selenium's scalability depends on the availability of hardware resources and the ability to parallelize test execution across multiple machines.
Test Coverage: Rainforest QA mainly focuses on functional testing by providing human testers who can validate the functionality, usability, and UI aspects of the application. Selenium, on the other hand, is a versatile tool that can be used for various types of testing, including functional, regression, integration, and performance testing. With Selenium, developers have more control over the test scripts and can cover a wider range of test scenarios.
Integration: Rainforest QA provides integrations with various popular tools and platforms such as Slack, Jira, Trello, etc., allowing seamless collaboration between testers and developers. Selenium being a programming framework, offers extensive integration capabilities with third-party tools, continuous integration systems, project management tools, and source code repositories.

In Summary, Rainforest QA is a cloud-based testing platform that relies on human testers for test execution, while Selenium is an open-source automation framework that allows developers to write and execute tests using programming languages. Rainforest QA offers a ready-made test environment with managed testing resources, while Selenium requires users to set up their own test infrastructure. Rainforest QA focuses on functional testing with human judgment, while Selenium is a versatile tool suitable for various types of testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Rainforest QA, Selenium

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rainforest QA	Selenium
Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.	Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Infinitely Scalable, On-Demand QA Team; Cross Browser Testing; Regression, Functional, and Exploratory Testing; Super Fast Results; Test results direct to your Inbox; Support Powered by Engineers; Integrates with your Chat and Bug trackers; Works with Continuous Deployment	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 33.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 8.6K
Stacks 37	Stacks 16.2K
Followers 68	Followers 12.6K
Votes 53	Votes 527
Pros & Cons
Pros 13 Cross-browser testing 7 Super-simple test creation 7 QA 7 Powerful API 6 Easy way to get real front-end smoke tests	Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers
Integrations
Slack Codeship Pivotal Tracker HipChat CircleCI Jira	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Rainforest QA, Selenium?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Autify

It is a software testing automation platform powered by AI. Autify helps in creating the Quality Assurance team to deliver the best version of their product in record time.

Related Comparisons

Rainforest QA vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Rainforest QA vs Selenium

Introduction:

Test Environment: Rainforest QA is a cloud-based testing platform that provides a distributed network of human testers to execute tests across various environments, browsers, and devices. On the other hand, Selenium is an open-source automation framework that allows developers to write and execute tests using various programming languages such as Java, C#, Python, etc. Rainforest QA offers a ready-made testing environment with a team of testers available, while Selenium requires a dedicated setup and development skills.
Test Execution: Rainforest QA relies on human testers who follow predefined test cases and provide feedback, making it suitable for exploratory testing and scenarios that require human judgment. Selenium, on the other hand, uses automation scripts to execute tests, enabling faster and repetitive test execution without human intervention. Selenium is more suitable for regression testing and continuous integration workflows.
Maintenance: Rainforest QA takes care of maintaining its test environment, including managing the pool of testers, test cases, and test execution infrastructure. This relieves the burden of setup and maintenance from the users. Selenium, being an open-source tool, requires users to manage their own test environments, including managing test scripts, browser compatibility, and infrastructure setup.
Scalability: Rainforest QA offers the advantage of scalable testing by providing on-demand access to a large pool of human testers. This makes it easy to scale up or down based on the testing requirements. Selenium's scalability depends on the availability of hardware resources and the ability to parallelize test execution across multiple machines.
Test Coverage: Rainforest QA mainly focuses on functional testing by providing human testers who can validate the functionality, usability, and UI aspects of the application. Selenium, on the other hand, is a versatile tool that can be used for various types of testing, including functional, regression, integration, and performance testing. With Selenium, developers have more control over the test scripts and can cover a wider range of test scenarios.
Integration: Rainforest QA provides integrations with various popular tools and platforms such as Slack, Jira, Trello, etc., allowing seamless collaboration between testers and developers. Selenium being a programming framework, offers extensive integration capabilities with third-party tools, continuous integration systems, project management tools, and source code repositories.

Rainforest QA vs Selenium

Overview

Rainforest QA vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Rainforest QA vs Selenium