StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. TestCafe vs react-testing-library

TestCafe vs react-testing-library

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestCafe
TestCafe
Stacks262
Followers273
Votes26
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks678
react-testing-library
react-testing-library
Stacks297
Followers156
Votes4

TestCafe vs react-testing-library: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web development, there are several popular tools and frameworks available for testing web applications. Two of these widely used options are TestCafe and react-testing-library. While both serve the purpose of testing web applications, they have key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Setup and Configuration: TestCafe requires minimal setup and configuration, making it easier for developers to get started with testing. It works with any modern web browser and does not require additional tools or drivers. On the other hand, react-testing-library requires developers to set up a testing environment using tools like Jest and Enzyme.

  2. Testing Approach: TestCafe focuses on end-to-end testing, which means it simulates user interaction and tests the application from the user's perspective. It can interact with DOM elements, handle events, and assert results. React-testing-library, on the other hand, follows a more unit-like testing approach. It encourages testing components in isolation without depending on implementation details.

  3. DOM Interaction: TestCafe provides a high-level API to interact with the DOM, making it easier to write tests. It automatically waits for page elements to appear and supports assertions on their states. React-testing-library, on the other hand, avoids simulating user interaction and prefers a more realistic approach. It encourages developers to interact with the DOM as a user would, using queries like getByTestId and getByText.

  4. Component Rendering: TestCafe does not render React components during testing. It interacts with the application through the browser and treats it as a black box. React-testing-library, on the other hand, renders components into a virtual DOM using tools like React's render() method. This allows developers to test component rendering and behavior more thoroughly.

  5. Testing Library Usage: react-testing-library is specifically designed for testing React applications. It provides a set of utilities and functions tailored for React components, making it easier to test React-specific features like hooks and context. TestCafe, on the other hand, is a general-purpose testing tool that can be used to test any web application, regardless of the underlying framework.

  6. Test Execution: TestCafe runs tests directly in the browser, interacting with the application in a realistic manner. This allows it to handle complex scenarios such as interacting with third-party libraries or simulating realistic user behavior. react-testing-library, on the other hand, runs tests in a virtual environment using tools like JSDOM. While this speeds up the testing process, it might not accurately represent the behavior of the application in a real browser.

In summary, TestCafe and react-testing-library have key differences in their setup and configuration, testing approach, DOM interaction, component rendering, testing library usage, and test execution. These differences make each tool suitable for different testing scenarios and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestCafe
TestCafe
react-testing-library
react-testing-library

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.

Create stable tests (and no manual timeouts); Write in latest JS or TypeScript; Detect JS errors in your code; Launch concurrent tests; Build readable tests with PageObject; Include tests in continuous integration system; Rapid test development
light-weight solution for testing; React DOM testing utilities; works with any environment that provides DOM APIs;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
678
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
262
Stacks
297
Followers
273
Followers
156
Votes
26
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Cross-browser testing
  • 4
    Easy setup/installation
  • 4
    Built in waits
  • 4
    Open source
  • 3
    UI End to End testing
Cons
  • 9
    No longer free
Pros
  • 3
    We can test behavior
  • 1
    Good documentation
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins
Jenkins
Travis CI
Travis CI
TeamCity
TeamCity
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to TestCafe, react-testing-library?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana