Robot Framework vs Selenide

Overview

Robot Framework

Stacks344

Followers525

Votes120

Selenide

Stacks56

Followers85

Votes16

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Robot Framework vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Programming Language Support: Robot Framework supports multiple programming languages such as Python, Java, and .NET, allowing flexibility in choosing the language for test automation. On the other hand, Selenide is primarily based on Java, limiting language options for users who prefer other programming languages.
Abstraction Level: Selenide provides a higher level of abstraction compared to Robot Framework, simplifying the test code and making it more readable. It reduces the need for writing boilerplate code and allows testers to focus more on test scenarios rather than implementation details.
Resource Management: Robot Framework comes with built-in libraries for handling test resources such as files, databases, and network connections, making it easier to manage and control resources during test execution. In contrast, Selenide may require additional setup and configuration for resource management functionalities.
Browser Automation: Selenide is specifically designed for browser automation using Selenium WebDriver, providing seamless integration and compatibility with different browsers. While Robot Framework also supports browser automation, it may require more configuration and setup for handling web elements and interacting with web pages.
Community Support: Robot Framework has a larger and more active community compared to Selenide, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and ready-to-use libraries for various testing needs. The strong community support for Robot Framework can be advantageous for beginners and experienced users seeking assistance and resources.
Test Reporting: Selenide offers built-in reporting features that allow users to generate detailed and customized test reports, providing valuable insights into test execution results. In contrast, while Robot Framework also supports test reporting, users may need to configure and customize the reporting features based on their requirements.

In Summary, Robot Framework and Selenide differ in terms of programming language support, abstraction level, resource management, browser automation, community support, and test reporting capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Robot Framework, Selenide

Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

react-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.6k views96.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Robot Framework	Selenide
It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.	It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.
-	Concise fluent API for tests; Ajax support for stable tests; Powerful selectors; Simple configuration
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 344	Stacks 56
Followers 525	Followers 85
Votes 120	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 23 Easy with CI/CD 22 Open Source 21 Simple Usage 14 Easily extendable 13 Vast Scope more than Front End Cons 8 Nested Loops 1 Mostly for python 1 Devtooling is not there 0 Mobile supports 0 Extensive library support	Pros 5 Nice JAVA API 2 Very mature API 2 Integrated with WebDriverManager project 2 File upload support 2 Integrated with Selenium-Jupiter framework Cons 1 Hybrid page model not possible
Integrations
No integrations available	BrowserStack Android Studio Selendroid Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Robot Framework, Selenide?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Related Comparisons

Robot Framework vs Selenide: What are the differences?

Programming Language Support: Robot Framework supports multiple programming languages such as Python, Java, and .NET, allowing flexibility in choosing the language for test automation. On the other hand, Selenide is primarily based on Java, limiting language options for users who prefer other programming languages.
Abstraction Level: Selenide provides a higher level of abstraction compared to Robot Framework, simplifying the test code and making it more readable. It reduces the need for writing boilerplate code and allows testers to focus more on test scenarios rather than implementation details.
Resource Management: Robot Framework comes with built-in libraries for handling test resources such as files, databases, and network connections, making it easier to manage and control resources during test execution. In contrast, Selenide may require additional setup and configuration for resource management functionalities.
Browser Automation: Selenide is specifically designed for browser automation using Selenium WebDriver, providing seamless integration and compatibility with different browsers. While Robot Framework also supports browser automation, it may require more configuration and setup for handling web elements and interacting with web pages.
Community Support: Robot Framework has a larger and more active community compared to Selenide, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and ready-to-use libraries for various testing needs. The strong community support for Robot Framework can be advantageous for beginners and experienced users seeking assistance and resources.
Test Reporting: Selenide offers built-in reporting features that allow users to generate detailed and customized test reports, providing valuable insights into test execution results. In contrast, while Robot Framework also supports test reporting, users may need to configure and customize the reporting features based on their requirements.

Robot Framework vs Selenide

Overview