StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. RuboCop vs SonarLint

RuboCop vs SonarLint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41
SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16

RuboCop vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between RuboCop and SonarLint. RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer and formatter, while SonarLint is a code analysis tool that supports multiple programming languages. These tools have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart from each other.

  1. Language Support: RuboCop specifically focuses on analyzing and formatting Ruby code, whereas SonarLint provides support for multiple programming languages, including but not limited to Java, C#, JavaScript, Python, and PHP. This difference in language support makes SonarLint a more versatile tool for developers working with varied languages.

  2. Integration: RuboCop integrates seamlessly with most popular Ruby development environments, such as RubyMine and Visual Studio Code, providing real-time feedback and automatic code formatting. On the other hand, SonarLint works as a plug-in or extension for integrated development environments (IDEs) like IntelliJ IDEA, Eclipse, and Visual Studio, allowing developers to take advantage of its code analysis capabilities within their preferred development environment.

  3. Rule Set and Customization: RuboCop comes with a predefined set of rules and style guidelines for Ruby code, making it easier for developers to enforce a consistent coding style. It also allows for extensive customization by enabling users to specify additional rules or modify existing ones. On the contrary, SonarLint provides a comprehensive set of rules for each supported programming language, covering a wide range of code quality and security aspects. While limited customization is possible in SonarLint, it primarily focuses on providing out-of-the-box rule sets that cater to different coding standards.

  4. Static Analysis: RuboCop primarily focuses on static code analysis for Ruby, detecting issues related to code complexity, style violations, and potential bugs. It helps developers identify and rectify problematic code patterns and improve code quality. SonarLint, on the other hand, offers more advanced static code analysis capabilities by incorporating various techniques like abstract syntax tree (AST) traversal, data flow analysis, and rule-based checks. This enables SonarLint to identify a broader range of code smells, security vulnerabilities, and potential architectural issues.

  5. Build Integration: In the context of build automation, RuboCop can be integrated into the build process of Ruby projects using tools like Rake or other task runners. This allows for code analysis and enforcement as part of the build pipeline. SonarLint, however, provides more extensive build integration through plugins for build management tools like Maven and Gradle. This enables developers to seamlessly incorporate code analysis into the build lifecycle and enforce quality gates before generating build artifacts.

  6. Reporting and Visualization: RuboCop generates reports and outputs them in the command-line interface or in predefined formats like HTML, XML, or JSON. It also supports integration with various code review and continuous integration tools. SonarLint, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive reporting and visualization environment where developers can explore code issues, track code quality trends, and view detailed metrics through a web-based dashboard. It provides interactive charts, graphs, and drill-down capabilities to facilitate deeper analysis of code issues and trends.

In summary, RuboCop is primarily focused on Ruby code analysis and formatting, with customizable rule sets and build automation integration. SonarLint, on the other hand, provides broader language support, advanced static code analysis techniques, extensive reporting capabilities, and build integration with popular build management tools. These differences make SonarLint a more comprehensive and versatile code analysis tool suited for multi-language projects, while RuboCop excels in its specialized domain of Ruby code analysis and style enforcement.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on RuboCop, SonarLint

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

RuboCop
RuboCop
SonarLint
SonarLint

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

-
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
175
Followers
222
Followers
352
Votes
41
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Follows the Ruby Style Guide by default
  • 4
    Customizable
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to RuboCop, SonarLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana