Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
3scale vs Apiman: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Here are the key differences between 3scale and Apiman:
Architecture: 3scale follows a SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) architecture, where the API management system is hosted and managed by 3scale. On the other hand, Apiman is more flexible and can be deployed either as a standalone system or within a cloud environment. This difference in architecture offers different levels of control and customization options for the users.
Pricing Model: 3scale offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a recurring fee based on the usage and features they require. Apiman, on the other hand, is an open-source project released under the Apache License 2.0. It is free to use and users only need to bear the infrastructure costs for hosting and running the system.
Integration Capabilities: 3scale provides out-of-the-box integration with various popular API gateways and platforms, allowing for seamless integration into existing infrastructure. Apiman also offers integration capabilities, but it requires more manual setup and configuration processes compared to 3scale. This difference can impact the ease and speed of implementation for users.
Customization and Extensibility: 3scale offers a high level of customization and extensibility options, allowing users to tailor the platform to match their specific requirements. Apiman also offers some customization options, but it may require more technical expertise and effort compared to 3scale. This difference in customization capabilities can be important for users with unique API management needs.
Developer Portal Features: 3scale provides a comprehensive developer portal with features like API documentation, interactive API explorer, and developer onboarding tools. Apiman also offers developer portal features but it may require additional configuration and customization to achieve a similar level of functionality as 3scale. This difference can impact the developer experience and ease of adoption of the APIs.
Community Support: 3scale has a well-established and active community, providing support, resources, and regular updates. Apiman also has a community support system but it may not be as extensive as 3scale. This difference can affect the availability of resources, plugins, and community-contributed enhancements for the users.
In summary, 3scale offers a SaaS architecture with seamless integration, extensive customization options, and a comprehensive developer portal, while Apiman provides more flexibility in deployment, an open-source model, and customization capabilities requiring additional technical expertise. Users can choose based on their specific needs and priorities.
Pros of 3scale
- Integrated developer portal6
- Full lifecycle api management4
- Plugable api management layer3
- Separates policy definition from enforcement3