StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. ActiveMQ vs CloudAMQP

ActiveMQ vs CloudAMQP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudAMQP
CloudAMQP
Stacks62
Followers84
Votes7
ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ
Stacks879
Followers1.3K
Votes77
GitHub Stars2.4K
Forks1.5K

ActiveMQ vs CloudAMQP: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment: ActiveMQ is a Java-based message broker that can be self-hosted on-premises or on cloud servers. In contrast, CloudAMQP is a managed service provided by a third-party provider that handles deployment and maintenance for users.
  2. Scaling: ActiveMQ allows users to manually scale the message broker by adding more instances or configuring clustering. CloudAMQP offers automatic scaling based on workload demands, without the need for user intervention.
  3. Pricing Model: ActiveMQ is typically free to use, but users are responsible for managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, CloudAMQP offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on usage, with different tiers and features to choose from.
  4. Monitoring and Management: ActiveMQ requires users to set up monitoring and management tools themselves to track performance and troubleshoot issues. CloudAMQP includes built-in monitoring and management features, providing users with real-time insights and alerts.
  5. Security: ActiveMQ users are responsible for implementing security measures such as encryption and access controls on their own. CloudAMQP includes built-in security features like TLS encryption, virtual private cloud support, and role-based access control to ensure data protection.
  6. Ease of Use: ActiveMQ requires users to have a certain level of expertise in setting up and managing the message broker. CloudAMQP provides a user-friendly interface and simplifies the process of configuring and using the message broker for users of all skill levels.

In Summary, ActiveMQ and CloudAMQP differ in deployment options, scaling capabilities, pricing models, monitoring and management features, security implementations, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CloudAMQP, ActiveMQ

Mickael
Mickael

DevOps Engineer at Rookout

Mar 1, 2020

Decided

In addition to being a lot cheaper, Google Cloud Pub/Sub allowed us to not worry about maintaining any more infrastructure that needed.

We moved from a self-hosted RabbitMQ over to CloudAMQP and decided that since we use GCP anyway, why not try their managed PubSub?

It is one of the better decisions that we made, and we can just focus about building more important stuff!

472k views472k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CloudAMQP
CloudAMQP
ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ

Fully managed, highly available RabbitMQ servers and clusters, on all major compute platforms.

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

Support - 24/7 support, via email, chat and phone.; Real time metrics and alarms - Get notified in advanced when your queues are growing faster than you're consuming them, when you're servers are over loaded etc. and take action before it becomes a problem.; Auto-healing - Our monitoring systems automatically detects and fixes a lot of problems such as kernel bugs, auto-restarts, RabbitMQ/Erlang version upgrades etc.; Metrics - Of course the default RabbitMQ interface is available, which gives you great inspection capabilities of your queues and message throughput, but we also gives you CPU, RAM and disk graphs to help you monitor the health and resource consumption of your clusters.;
Protect your data & Balance your Load; Easy enterprise integration patterns; Flexible deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
62
Stacks
879
Followers
84
Followers
1.3K
Votes
7
Votes
77
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Some of the best customer support you'll ever find
  • 3
    Easy to provision
Pros
  • 18
    Easy to use
  • 14
    Open source
  • 13
    Efficient
  • 10
    JMS compliant
  • 6
    High Availability
Cons
  • 1
    Low resilience to exceptions and interruptions
  • 1
    ONLY Vertically Scalable
  • 1
    Support
  • 1
    Difficult to scale
Integrations
AppHarbor
AppHarbor
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Heroku
Heroku
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
dotCloud
dotCloud
Pivotal Web Services (PWS)
Pivotal Web Services (PWS)
AppFog
AppFog
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CloudAMQP, ActiveMQ?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

IronMQ

IronMQ

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase