Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
ActiveMQ vs Protobuf: What are the differences?
- 1. Scalability: ActiveMQ is a message-oriented middleware that is built on the Java Message Service (JMS) standard, which allows for high scalability and distributed messaging. It can handle very large message volumes and can be easily scaled up to meet the demands of a growing system. On the other hand, Protobuf is not specifically designed for scaled message distribution but rather focuses on efficient serialization and deserialization of structured data.
- 2. Language Support: ActiveMQ primarily supports Java, but it also provides support for multiple languages through connectors and protocols. It can be used with languages such as C++, .NET, Ruby, and more. On the other hand, Protobuf is a language-agnostic data serialization format that can be used with various programming languages, including Java, C++, Python, and more. It provides APIs for generating code bindings in different languages.
- 3. Message Format: ActiveMQ supports various message formats, including TextMessage, BytesMessage, ObjectMessage, and MapMessage. These formats allow flexibility in exchanging different types of data between systems. In contrast, Protobuf uses a binary message format that optimizes data serialization for efficient storage and transmission. It uses a structured schema definition to define the message format and provides efficient serialization and deserialization of the data.
- 4. Persistence: ActiveMQ provides built-in persistence options like JDBC, KahaDB, and LevelDB, which allow messages to be stored in databases or disk-based stores. This ensures message durability and reliability even in the event of system failures. On the other hand, Protobuf does not have built-in persistence capabilities as it focuses on efficient data serialization, and it's up to the application to handle persistence if required.
- 5. Messaging Patterns: ActiveMQ supports a wide range of messaging patterns, including point-to-point, publish/subscribe, request/reply, and more. These patterns enable different communication styles between applications and components. In contrast, Protobuf does not provide native support for messaging patterns as it is primarily focused on the serialization and deserialization of structured data.
- 6. Interoperability: ActiveMQ provides seamless integration with other JMS-compliant messaging systems, allowing for interoperability between different messaging implementations. It can ensure compatibility and communication between systems using different messaging platforms. Protobuf, on the other hand, can be integrated into various systems and languages through code generation, enabling interoperability at the data level.
In Summary, ActiveMQ offers scalability, language support, various message formats, persistence options, messaging patterns, and interoperability, making it a powerful message-oriented middleware. Protobuf, on the other hand, focuses on efficient data serialization and does not provide native support for messaging patterns or built-in persistence.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of ActiveMQ
Pros of Protobuf
Pros of ActiveMQ
- Easy to use18
- Open source14
- Efficient13
- JMS compliant10
- High Availability6
- Scalable5
- Distributed Network of brokers3
- Persistence3
- Support XA (distributed transactions)3
- Docker delievery1
- Highly configurable1
- RabbitMQ0
Pros of Protobuf
Be the first to leave a pro
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ActiveMQ
Cons of Protobuf
Cons of ActiveMQ
- ONLY Vertically Scalable1
- Support1
- Low resilience to exceptions and interruptions1
- Difficult to scale1
Cons of Protobuf
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is ActiveMQ?
Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
What is Protobuf?
Protocol buffers are Google's language-neutral, platform-neutral, extensible mechanism for serializing structured data – think XML, but smaller, faster, and simpler.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use ActiveMQ?
What companies use Protobuf?
What companies use ActiveMQ?
What companies use Protobuf?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with ActiveMQ?
What tools integrate with Protobuf?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+9 15
1710
+35 41
19286
What are some alternatives to ActiveMQ and Protobuf?
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
Kafka
Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
Apollo
Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.
IBM MQ
It is a messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and business data across multiple platforms. It offers proven, enterprise-grade messaging capabilities that skillfully and safely move information.
ZeroMQ
The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.