StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Adobe Experience Manager vs Joomla!

Adobe Experience Manager vs Joomla!

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Joomla!
Joomla!
Stacks1.5K
Followers337
Votes37
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks3.7K
Adobe Experience Manager
Adobe Experience Manager
Stacks915
Followers219
Votes0

Adobe Experience Manager vs Joomla!: What are the differences?

Introduction

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) and Joomla! are content management systems (CMS) that enable users to create and manage digital content. Both platforms have their strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different types of projects.

  1. Technology Stack: Adobe Experience Manager is built on Java and uses Apache Sling to develop content-oriented applications. On the other hand, Joomla! is built on PHP and uses a MySQL database. This difference in technology stack can impact the performance, scalability, and customization options available in each platform.

  2. User Interface and Ease of Use: Adobe Experience Manager is known for its complex user interface and steep learning curve, primarily designed for enterprise-level users. In contrast, Joomla! offers a more user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easier for beginners and small to medium-sized businesses to manage their websites without advanced technical knowledge.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Adobe Experience Manager is highly scalable and suitable for large enterprises handling complex websites with heavy traffic. It prioritizes performance and can handle demanding workloads efficiently. Joomla!, while scalable, may face limitations in handling large-scale websites with high traffic volumes compared to AEM.

  4. Customization and Flexibility: Adobe Experience Manager provides extensive customization options to tailor websites to specific business requirements. It allows for granular control over design elements and functionality. Joomla!, while flexible, may have limitations in terms of customization options available out-of-the-box, requiring more development effort for complex customization.

  5. Market Position and Target Audience: Adobe Experience Manager is positioned as an enterprise-grade CMS suitable for large organizations with complex digital marketing needs. It caters to businesses willing to invest in a robust platform for managing their digital experience effectively. Joomla! targets small to medium-sized businesses and individuals looking for a cost-effective and user-friendly CMS solution to build and maintain their websites.

In Summary, Adobe Experience Manager and Joomla! differ in their technology stack, user interface, scalability, customization options, and target audience, making them suitable for distinct types of projects and user needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Joomla!, Adobe Experience Manager

Dragos
Dragos

Jan 6, 2020

Decided

10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress: https://www.wpdoze.com

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Joomla!
Joomla!
Adobe Experience Manager
Adobe Experience Manager

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

It is a Web Content Management System that allows companies to manage their web content (Web pages, digital assets, forms, etc) and also create digital experiences with this content on any platform web, mobile or IoT.

User Management;Media Manager;Language Manager;Banner Management;Contact Management; Polls;Search;Web Link Management;Content Management;Syndication and Newsfeed Management;Menu Manager;Template Management;Integrated Help System;System Features;Web Services;Powerful Extensibility
Content Storage; Creative Cloud Integration; Tags and Metadata Management; Intelligent Search;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.5K
Stacks
915
Followers
337
Followers
219
Votes
37
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Powerful extension architecture
  • 6
    Powerfull CMS
  • 5
    Mid-Hight End level CMS
  • 4
    Highly customizable
  • 2
    Vast repository of free and paid extensions
Cons
  • 1
    Depleting dev community
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
Angular
Angular

What are some alternatives to Joomla!, Adobe Experience Manager?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack