StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Adobe Experience Manager vs Wagtail

Adobe Experience Manager vs Wagtail

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Wagtail
Wagtail
Stacks163
Followers288
Votes132
Adobe Experience Manager
Adobe Experience Manager
Stacks915
Followers219
Votes0

Adobe Experience Manager vs Wagtail: What are the differences?

Introduction

Adobe Experience Manager and Wagtail are both powerful content management systems, but they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Target Audience: Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is best suited for enterprise-level organizations that require a robust and scalable content management system, while Wagtail is more commonly used by small to medium-sized businesses due to its user-friendly interface and ease of use for non-technical users.

  2. Flexibility and Customization: AEM offers a high level of flexibility and customization options, making it ideal for large businesses with complex requirements. Wagtail, on the other hand, is known for its simplicity and ease of use, with a focus on providing a straightforward and intuitive CMS experience.

  3. Integration and Compatibility: AEM integrates seamlessly with other Adobe products such as Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target, offering a comprehensive digital experience solution. Wagtail, on the other hand, may require additional plugins or custom development to achieve similar levels of integration with third-party tools and services.

  4. Scalability and Performance: AEM is designed to handle large volumes of content and traffic, making it a suitable choice for high-traffic websites and applications. Wagtail, while capable of handling smaller-scale projects effectively, may face limitations in terms of scalability and performance when compared to AEM.

  5. Cost: Adobe Experience Manager is a premium product with a higher cost of ownership, making it more suitable for organizations with larger budgets. Wagtail, being an open-source CMS, is more cost-effective for businesses with limited financial resources looking for a reliable content management solution.

In summary, Adobe Experience Manager and Wagtail cater to different needs in terms of target audience, flexibility, integration, scalability, and cost, making it crucial for businesses to choose a CMS that aligns with their specific requirements and budget constraints.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Wagtail
Wagtail
Adobe Experience Manager
Adobe Experience Manager

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

It is a Web Content Management System that allows companies to manage their web content (Web pages, digital assets, forms, etc) and also create digital experiences with this content on any platform web, mobile or IoT.

A fast, attractive editor interface;Complete control over design with standard Django templates;Configure content types through standard Django models;Tightly integrated search (with an Elasticsearch backend for production);Strong document and image management;Wide support for embedded content;Simple, configurable permissions;Support for tree-based content organisation;Optional preview->submit->approve workflow;Fast out of the box. Varnish-friendly if you need it;A simple form builder;Optional static site generation;Excellent test coverage
Content Storage; Creative Cloud Integration; Tags and Metadata Management; Intelligent Search;
Statistics
Stacks
163
Stacks
915
Followers
288
Followers
219
Votes
132
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Highly customizable
  • 18
    StreamFields are amazing
  • 18
    Very Flexible
  • 15
    Web content management
  • 13
    Non-tech colleagues can update website content
Cons
  • 3
    Not a full CMS: basic components require heavy coding
  • 2
    Small developer community
  • 1
    Expensive to develop
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
React
React
Angular
Angular

What are some alternatives to Wagtail, Adobe Experience Manager?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack