StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Payments
  4. Shipping
  5. AfterShip vs Parcel

AfterShip vs Parcel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AfterShip
AfterShip
Stacks17
Followers45
Votes1
Parcel
Parcel
Stacks874
Followers250
Votes18
GitHub Stars44.0K
Forks2.3K

AfterShip vs Parcel: What are the differences?

Introduction

AfterShip and Parcel are both shipment tracking platforms that help businesses and individuals track their packages. While both platforms offer similar services, there are key differences between the two. Below are the main differences between AfterShip and Parcel.

  1. Number of Supported Couriers: AfterShip supports over 740 couriers worldwide, including major carriers like UPS, FedEx, DHL, and USPS. Parcel, on the other hand, supports over 400 carriers worldwide. This means that AfterShip has a wider reach and can track packages from a larger number of courier services.

  2. Customizable Tracking Page: AfterShip provides users the ability to create a fully customizable tracking page where they can add their branding elements, custom URL, and tracking statuses. Parcel, on the other hand, does not offer the same level of customization and users have limited control over the appearance of their tracking page.

  3. Notifications and Alerts: AfterShip offers automated notifications and alerts to keep customers informed about the status of their shipments via email, SMS, webhook, or push notifications. Parcel also provides notifications, but the options are more limited compared to AfterShip.

  4. Delivery Time Analysis: AfterShip provides insights and analytics on delivery time performance for different carriers. Users can generate reports to analyze carrier performance and identify areas of improvement. Parcel does not offer the same level of delivery time analysis and performance tracking.

  5. API Integration: AfterShip offers a comprehensive API that enables easy integration of shipment tracking features into other applications or websites. Parcel also provides an API but the documentation and features are not as extensive as AfterShip's.

  6. Pricing: AfterShip offers both free and premium plans, with the premium plans offering additional features and higher usage limits. Parcel, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the number of shipments. This means that Parcel may be more cost-effective for businesses with lower shipment volumes, while AfterShip's free plan makes it more accessible for individuals or smaller businesses.

In summary, AfterShip supports a larger number of couriers, offers a customizable tracking page, provides extensive delivery time analysis, has a more comprehensive API, and offers a free plan. Parcel, on the other hand, has a subscription-based pricing model, offers more limited customization options for tracking pages, and has a slightly smaller carrier support network.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AfterShip
AfterShip
Parcel
Parcel

AfterShip provides shipment tracking API for online retailers, supporting 200 carriers worldwide.

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

Shipment tracking API & Webhook; Automated shipment tracking; Email & SMS delivery notifications; Track Button for shipment tracking at online store
Blazing fast bundle times; Bundle all your assets; Automatic transforms; Zero config code splitting; Hot module replacement; Friendly error logging
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
44.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
17
Stacks
874
Followers
45
Followers
250
Votes
1
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Great Support
Pros
  • 10
    Zero configuration
  • 8
    Built-in dev server with livereload
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of documentation
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to AfterShip, Parcel?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

SmartyStreets

SmartyStreets

Now it's faster and easier than ever to verify addresses on your website. Help your customers provide valid address data by verifying it in real-time with our API. Display multiple matches if the address is ambiguous, and alert them when the address is invalid. Your shipments will be cheaper and arrive faster, and your customers will be satisfied knowing that their addresses were submitted correctly the first time.

EasyPost

EasyPost

Add shipping APIs to your application in minutes instead of weeks. Get the best shipping rates by unlocking every major carrier in one simple integration.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp