StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Amazon CodeGuru vs Standard JS

Amazon CodeGuru vs Standard JS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Standard JS
Standard JS
Stacks80
Followers93
Votes1
Amazon CodeGuru
Amazon CodeGuru
Stacks68
Followers151
Votes24

Amazon CodeGuru vs Standard JS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon CodeGuru and Standard JS are both code analysis tools used by software developers to improve code quality and identify potential issues in their codebases. However, there are several key differences between the two tools that developers should consider when choosing the right tool for their needs.

  1. Scope of Analysis: Amazon CodeGuru provides a more comprehensive analysis of code quality by using machine learning algorithms to detect issues such as performance bottlenecks, resource leaks, and security vulnerabilities. On the other hand, Standard JS focuses primarily on enforcing code style and formatting conventions, such as indentation, spacing, and syntax rules.

  2. Integration with IDEs: Amazon CodeGuru offers seamless integration with popular IDEs such as IntelliJ IDEA and Visual Studio Code, providing real-time feedback and suggestions to developers as they write code. In contrast, Standard JS is typically integrated into the developer's build process through tools like ESLint, requiring a separate step to run the analysis on the codebase.

  3. Cost: Amazon CodeGuru is a paid service that charges based on the number of lines of code analyzed, with additional costs for advanced features like code reviews and recommendations. Standard JS, on the other hand, is an open-source tool that is free to use and can be customized to fit the specific needs of the development team.

  4. Performance Impact: Amazon CodeGuru may introduce some overhead in terms of runtime performance due to the sophisticated analysis techniques used to detect code issues. In contrast, Standard JS enforces code style rules statically and does not have a significant impact on the runtime performance of the application.

  5. Support for Languages: Amazon CodeGuru currently supports Java and Python, with plans to expand to other programming languages in the future. Standard JS, on the other hand, is primarily focused on JavaScript codebases and may not be suitable for projects written in other languages.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: Amazon CodeGuru provides a more tailored and automated approach to code analysis, with built-in features for code review recommendations and best practices. Standard JS, on the other hand, allows developers to configure and extend the tool's rules and plugins to meet their specific coding standards and requirements.

In Summary, Amazon CodeGuru offers a more comprehensive and advanced code analysis solution with machine learning capabilities, while Standard JS is a more lightweight and customizable tool focused on enforcing coding style conventions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Standard JS
Standard JS
Amazon CodeGuru
Amazon CodeGuru

It is a Style guide, with linter & automatic code fixer. It is a way to enforce consistent style in your project. It automatically formats code.

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

-
Automate code reviews; Fast and reliable code issue detection; Trained on decades of knowledge and experience; Understand the runtime behavior of applications; Intelligent recommendations; Always-on profiling of applications in production
Statistics
Stacks
80
Stacks
68
Followers
93
Followers
151
Votes
1
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Free
  • 0
    Customizable
Pros
  • 24
    What programming languages are supported?
Cons
  • 1
    Works only on Java code
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Java
Java
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate

What are some alternatives to Standard JS, Amazon CodeGuru?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana