Amazon EC2 Container Service vs AWS CodeCommit: What are the differences?
Amazon EC2 Container Service: Container management service that supports Docker containers. Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles; AWS CodeCommit: Fully-managed source control service that makes it easy for companies to host secure and highly scalable private Git repositories. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Amazon EC2 Container Service belongs to "Containers as a Service" category of the tech stack, while AWS CodeCommit can be primarily classified under "Code Collaboration & Version Control".
Some of the features offered by Amazon EC2 Container Service are:
- Docker Compatibility
- Managed Clusters
- Programmatic Control
On the other hand, AWS CodeCommit provides the following key features:
- Collaboration
- Encryption
- Access Control
"Backed by amazon" is the primary reason why developers consider Amazon EC2 Container Service over the competitors, whereas "Free private repos" was stated as the key factor in picking AWS CodeCommit.
According to the StackShare community, Amazon EC2 Container Service has a broader approval, being mentioned in 795 company stacks & 391 developers stacks; compared to AWS CodeCommit, which is listed in 25 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.
